Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611393›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

D

Ameer Hamza, Muhammad Attique Khan, Majed Alhaisoni, Abdullah Al Hejaili, Khalid Adel Shaban, Shtwai Alsubai, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ameer HamzaDepartment of Computer Science, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan.
Muhammad Attique KhanDepartment of Computer Science, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-4890
Majed AlhaisoniComputer Sciences Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Al HejailiFaculty of Computers & Information Technology, Computer Science Department, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Adel ShabanComputer Science Department, College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.
Shtwai AlsubaiCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6584-7400
Areej AlasiryCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Mehrez MarzouguiCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
HITEC University · PKKing Khalid University · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SASaudi Electronic University · SAUniversity of Tabuk · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn 2019, a corona virus disease (COVID-19) was detected in China that affected millions of people around the world. On 11 March 2020, the WHO declared this disease a pandemic. Currently, more than 200 countries in the world have been affected by this disease. The manual diagnosis of this disease using chest X-ray (CXR) images and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is time consuming and always requires an expert person; therefore, researchers introduced several computerized techniques using computer vision methods. The recent computerized techniques face some challenges, such as low contrast CTX images, the manual initialization of hyperparameters, and redundant features that mislead the classification accuracy.

methodsIn this paper, we proposed a novel framework for COVID-19 classification using deep Bayesian optimization and improved canonical correlation analysis (ICCA). In this proposed framework, we initially performed data augmentation for better training of the selected deep models. After that, two pre-trained deep models were employed (ResNet50 and InceptionV3) and trained using transfer learning. The hyperparameters of both models were initialized through Bayesian optimization. Both trained models were utilized for feature extractions and fused using an ICCA-based approach. The fused features were further optimized using an improved tree growth optimization algorithm that finally was classified using a neural network classifier.

resultsThe experimental process was conducted on five publically available datasets and achieved an accuracy of 99.6, 98.5, 99.9, 99.5, and 100%.

conclusionThe comparison with recent methods and t-test-based analysis showed the significance of this proposed framework.

Indexed as

Bayesian optimizationCOVID-19deep learningfusionneural networkoptimization

Identifiers

PMID36611393
PMCPMC9818184
OpenAlexW4313361170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.