Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611299›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Specification of Neck Muscle Dysfunction through Digital Image Analysis Using Machine Learning.

Filip Paskali, Jonathan Simantzik, Angela Dieterich, Matthias Kohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Filip PaskaliInstitute of Precision Medicine, Medical and Life Sciences, Hochschule Furtwangen, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9647-6294
Jonathan SimantzikInstitute of Precision Medicine, Medical and Life Sciences, Hochschule Furtwangen, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-6303
Angela DieterichPhysiotherapie, Fakultät Gesundheit, Sicherheit, Gesellschaft, Hochschule Furtwangen, Studienzentrum Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8522-8746
Matthias KohlInstitute of Precision Medicine, Medical and Life Sciences, Hochschule Furtwangen, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-8910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyone has or will have experienced some degree of neck pain. Typically, neck pain is associated with the sensation of tense, tight, or stiff neck muscles. However, it is unclear whether the neck muscles are objectively stiffer with neck pain. This study used 1099 ultrasound elastography images (elastograms) obtained from 38 adult women, 20 with chronic neck pain and 18 asymptomatic. For training machine learning algorithms, 28 numerical characteristics were extracted from both the original and transformed shear wave velocity color-coded images as well as from respective image segments. Overall, a total number of 323 distinct features were generated from the data. A supervised binary classification was performed, using six machine-learning algorithms. The random forest algorithm produced the most accurate model to distinguish the elastograms of women with chronic neck pain from asymptomatic women with an AUC of 0.898. When evaluating features that can be used as biomarkers for muscle dysfunction in neck pain, the region of the deepest neck muscles (M. multifidus) provided the most features to support the correct classification of elastograms. By constructing summary images and associated Hotelling's T

Indexed as

image analysismachine learningneck painshear wave elastographyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36611299
PMCPMC9818408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.