Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611144›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: systematic literature review of the antenatal landscape.

Derek P de Winter, Allysen Kaminski, May Lee Tjoa, Dick Oepkes

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rhesus testing and anti-D prophylaxis in RhD-negative women undergoing first-trimester abortion-Systematic Review and Opinion.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Reporting of management and outcomes in the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a systematic literature review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Doppler Assessment of the Fetal Brain Circulation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Targeting the Neonatal Fc Receptor in Autoimmune Diseases: Pipeline and Progress.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Research progress in RBC alloimmunization.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Derek P de WinterDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Allysen KaminskiOPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
May Lee TjoaJanssen Pharmaceuticals, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Dick OepkesDivision of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, K-06-35, PO Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands. D.Oepkes@lumc.nl.
George Washington University · USJanssen (United States) · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLSanquin · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevention of pregnancy-related alloimmunization and the management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) has significantly improved over the past decades. Considering improvements in HDFN care, the objectives of this systematic literature review were to assess the prenatal treatment landscape and outcomes of Rh(D)- and K-mediated HDFN in mothers and fetuses, to identify the burden of disease, to identify evidence gaps in the literature, and to provide recommendations for future research.

methodsWe performed a systematic search on MEDLINE, EMBASE and clinicaltrials.gov. Observational studies, trials, modelling studies, systematic reviews of cohort studies, and case reports and series of women and/or their fetus with HDFN caused by Rhesus (Rh)D or Kell alloimmunization. Extracted data included prevalence; treatment patterns; clinical outcomes; treatment efficacy; and mortality.

resultsWe identified 2,541 articles. After excluding 2,482 articles and adding 1 article from screening systematic reviews, 60 articles were selected. Most abstracted data were from case reports and case series. Prevalence was 0.047% and 0.006% for Rh(D)- and K-mediated HDFN, respectively. Most commonly reported antenatal treatment was intrauterine transfusion (IUT; median frequency [interquartile range]: 13.0% [7.2-66.0]). Average gestational age at first IUT ranged between 25 and 27 weeks. weeks. This timing is early and carries risks, which were observed in outcomes associated with IUTs. The rate of hydrops fetalis among pregnancies with Rh(D)-mediated HDFN treated with IUT was 14.8% (range, 0-50%) and 39.2% in K-mediated HDFN. Overall mean ± SD fetal mortality rate that was found to be 19.8%±29.4% across 19 studies. Mean gestational age at birth ranged between 34 and 36 weeks.

conclusionThese findings corroborate the rareness of HDFN and frequently needed intrauterine transfusion with inherent risks, and most births occur at a late preterm gestational age. We identified several evidence gaps providing opportunities for future studies.

Indexed as

Erythroblastosis, FetalBlood Transfusion, IntrauterineFemaleFetusHemolysisHumansHydrops FetalisPregnancyFetal anemiaFetal therapyHemolytic disease of the fetus and newbornIntrauterine transfusion

Identifiers

PMID36611144
PMCPMC9824959
OpenAlexW4313656412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.