Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611135›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023

Estimation of marginal structural models under irregular visits and unmeasured confounder: calibrated inverse probability weights.

Sumeet Kalia, Olli Saarela, Michael Escobar, Rahim Moineddin, Michelle Greiver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sumeet KaliaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. sumeet.kalia@utoronto.ca.
Olli SaarelaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Michael EscobarDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rahim MoineddinDepartment of family and community medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Michelle GreiverDepartment of family and community medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada CGS: 534600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical information collected in electronic health records (EHRs) is becoming an essential source to emulate randomized experiments. Since patients do not interact with the healthcare system at random, the longitudinal information in large observational databases must account for irregular visits. Moreover, we need to also account for subject-specific unmeasured confounders which may act as a common cause for treatment assignment mechanism (e.g. glucose-lowering medications) while also influencing the outcome (e.g. Hemoglobin A1c). We used the calibration of longitudinal weights to improve the finite sample properties and to account for subject-specific unmeasured confounders. A Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted to evaluate the performance of calibrated inverse probability estimators using time-dependent treatment assignment and irregular visits with subject-specific unmeasured confounders. The simulation study showed that the longitudinal weights with calibrated restrictions improved the finite sample bias when compared to the stabilized weights. The application of the calibrated weights is demonstrated using the exposure of glucose lowering medications and the longitudinal outcome of Hemoglobin A1c. Our results support the effectiveness of glucose lowering medications in reducing Hemoglobin A1c among type II diabetes patients with elevated glycemic index ([Formula: see text]) using stabilized and calibrated weights.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Models, StatisticalComputer SimulationGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansModels, StructuralProbabilityGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinCalibrated weightsConstrained optimizationElectronic health recordsLongitudinal data analysisMarginal structural modelsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID36611135
PMCPMC9825036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.