Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611009›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Roughage level and supplemental fat for newly received finishing calves: effects on growth performance, health, and physiological responses.

Vinícius N Gouvêa, Mario O Oliveira, Hiam Jardel M Giacomelli, Eduardo A Colombo, Fernanda Batistel, Flávio A P Santos, Glenn C Duff, Rodrigo S Marques, Reinaldo F Cooke

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Vinícius N GouvêaTexas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8317-4908
Mario O OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP 13418900, Brazil.
Hiam Jardel M GiacomelliDepartment of Animal Science, Santa Catarina State University, Chapecó, SC 89815630, Brazil.
Eduardo A ColomboDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Fernanda BatistelDepartment of Animal Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Flávio A P SantosDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP 13418900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5583-3286
Glenn C DuffClayton Livestock Research Center, New Mexico State University, Clayton, NM 88415, USA.
Rodrigo S MarquesDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4590-2898
Reinaldo F CookeDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-3601
Texas A&M University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRMontana State University · USNew Mexico State University · USTexas A&M University System · USUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina · BRUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This experiment evaluated the effects of roughage levels and supplemental fat on intake, growth performance, health, and physiological responses of newly received finishing cattle during 58-d receiving period. A total of 72 crossbred steers (initial body weight [BW] = 200 ± 13 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments, consisting of two roughage levels (wheat hay at 30% [R30] or 60% [R60]; dry matter [DM] basis) and two levels of supplemental fat (yellow grease at 0% [-FAT; no additional fat] or 3.5% [+FAT]; DM basis). Upon arrival, calves were individually weighed, blocked by off-truck shrunk BW, and assigned to 24 soil-surfaced pens (three calves per pen). Shrunk BW was also collected on day 58 for the calculation of average daily gain (ADG). Throughout the study, calves were assessed for bovine respiratory disease (BRD). Effects of roughage level × supplemental fat interaction were only observed for diet particle size distribution and estimated physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF) of diets (P ≤ 0.10). Adding fat to R60 diets tended to increase the percentage of particles retained in the 8-mm screen (P = 0.06) and the estimated peNDF (P = 0.10), but did not affect R30 diets. Dietary roughage level did not affect DM intake (DMI; P = 0.85). Calves-fed R30 tended to have greater ADG and final BW than calves-fed R60 (P ≤ 0.08). Gain efficiency (gain:feed ratio; G:F) was greater for calves-fed R30 than calves-fed R60 (P = 0.01). Dietary roughage level did not affect morbidity and mortality (P ≥ 0.11). Supplemental fat did not affect DMI (P = 0.6) but tended (P = 0.09) to increase ADG compared to -FAT diets. The G:F was greater for calves-fed +FAT than -FAT (P = 0.03). The +FAT diet tended (P = 0.10) to increase the number of retreatments against BRD compared to -FAT, although the total number of antimicrobial treatments required to treat sick calves (P = 0.78) and the mortality rate (P = 0.99) were not affected by supplemental fat. Feeding +FAT diet tended (P ≤ 0.09) to increase plasma concentration of cortisol and immunoglobulin-G compared to -FAT. In summary, feeding 30% roughage diets or adding 3.5% yellow grease (DM basis) as supplemental fat increased G:F during the feedlot receiving period.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesDietary FiberAnimal FeedAnimalsBody CompositionCattleDietWeight GainDietary Fiberbeef cattlefatty acidsfeedlot receivingfibermorbidity

Identifiers

PMID36611009
PMCPMC9831098
OpenAlexW4313702085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.