Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36610997›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Metadata retrieval from sequence databases with ffq.

Ángel Gálvez-Merchán, Kyung Hoi Joseph Min, Lior Pachter, A Sina Booeshaghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. iSeq: an integrated tool to fetch public sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Universal preprocessing of single-cell genomics data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Efficient querying of genomic reference databases with gget.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ángel Gálvez-MerchánDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Kyung Hoi Joseph MinDepartment of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 91125, USA.
Lior PachterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
A Sina BooeshaghiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6442-4502

Funding

Generation of novel cell type specific mouse genetic toolsU19MH114830 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J, PACHTER, LIOR S · 2017 to 2021
$64.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH114830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSeveral genomic databases host data and metadata for an ever-growing collection of sequence datasets. While these databases have a shared hierarchical structure, there are no tools specifically designed to leverage it for metadata extraction.

resultsWe present a command-line tool, called ffq, for querying user-generated data and metadata from sequence databases. Given an accession or a paper's DOI, ffq efficiently fetches metadata and links to raw data in JSON format. ffq's modularity and simplicity make it extensible to any genomic database exposing its data for programmatic access. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ffq is free and open source, and the code can be found here: https://github.com/pachterlab/ffq.

Indexed as

MetadataSoftwareDatabases, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36610997
PMCPMC9883619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.