Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36610989›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Efficient querying of genomic reference databases with gget.

Laura Luebbert, Lior Pachter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura LuebbertDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1379-2927
Lior PachterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Funding

Generation of novel cell type specific mouse genetic toolsU19MH114830 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2017 to 2021
$64.7M
Biology and Bioengineering Division at the California Institute of TechnologyChen Graduate Innovator Grant CHEN.SYS3.CGIAFY21NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH114830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationA recurring challenge in interpreting genomic data is the assessment of results in the context of existing reference databases. With the increasing number of command line and Python users, there is a need for tools implementing automated, easy programmatic access to curated reference information stored in a diverse collection of large, public genomic databases.

resultsgget is a free and open-source command line tool and Python package that enables efficient querying of genomic reference databases, such as Ensembl. gget consists of a collection of separate but interoperable modules, each designed to facilitate one type of database querying required for genomic data analysis in a single line of code. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The manual and source code are available at https://github.com/pachterlab/gget. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

GenomicsSoftwareData AnalysisDatabases, FactualGenome

Identifiers

PMID36610989
PMCPMC9835474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.