Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36610988›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Accurate estimation of molecular counts from amplicon sequence data with unique molecular identifiers.

Xiyu Peng, Karin S Dorman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiyu PengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4232-0910
Karin S DormanDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-0018

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAmplicon sequencing is widely applied to explore heterogeneity and rare variants in genetic populations. Resolving true biological variants and quantifying their abundance is crucial for downstream analyses, but measured abundances are distorted by stochasticity and bias in amplification, plus errors during polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. One solution attaches unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) to sample sequences before amplification. Counting UMIs instead of sequences provides unbiased estimates of abundance. While modern methods improve over naïve counting by UMI identity, most do not account for UMI reuse or collision, and they do not adequately model PCR and sequencing errors in the UMIs and sample sequences.

resultsWe introduce Deduplication and Abundance estimation with UMIs (DAUMI), a probabilistic framework to detect true biological amplicon sequences and accurately estimate their deduplicated abundance. DAUMI recognizes UMI collision, even on highly similar sequences, and detects and corrects most PCR and sequencing errors in the UMI and sampled sequences. DAUMI performs better on simulated and real data compared to other UMI-aware clustering methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is available at https://github.com/DormanLab/AmpliCI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSoftwareCluster AnalysisPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID36610988
PMCPMC9891248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.