Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36610678›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Whose emotion is it? Perspective matters to understand brain-body interactions in emotions.

Tahnée Engelen, Anne Buot, Julie Grèzes, Catherine Tallon-Baudry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Mind From Within: Visceral Roots of Human Cognition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Interoceptive rhythms in the brain.Nature neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Piecing together the puzzle of emotional consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tahnée EngelenCognitive and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory (LNC2), Inserm U960, Department of Cognitive Studies, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL University, 29 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France. Electronic address: tahnee.engelen@yahoo.nl.
Anne BuotCognitive and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory (LNC2), Inserm U960, Department of Cognitive Studies, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL University, 29 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
Julie GrèzesCognitive and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory (LNC2), Inserm U960, Department of Cognitive Studies, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL University, 29 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
Catherine Tallon-BaudryCognitive and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory (LNC2), Inserm U960, Department of Cognitive Studies, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL University, 29 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France. Electronic address: catherine.tallon-baudry@ens.psl.edu.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feeling happy, or judging whether someone else is feeling happy are two distinct facets of emotions that nevertheless rely on similar physiological and neural activity. Differentiating between these two states, also called Self/Other distinction, is an essential aspect of empathy, but how exactly is it implemented? In non-emotional cognition, the transient neural response evoked at each heartbeat, or heartbeat evoked response (HER), indexes the self and signals Self/Other distinction. Here, using electroencephalography (n = 32), we probe whether HERs' role in Self/Other distinction extends also to emotion - a domain where brain-body interactions are particularly relevant. We asked participants to rate independently validated affective scenes, reporting either their own emotion (Self) or the emotion expressed by people in the scene (Other). During the visual cue indicating to adopt the Self or Other perspective, before the affective scene, HERs distinguished between the two conditions, in visual cortices as well as in the right frontal operculum. Physiological reactivity (facial electromyogram, skin conductance, heart rate) during affective scene co-varied as expected with valence and arousal ratings, but also with the Self- or Other- perspective adopted. Finally, HERs contributed to the subjective experience of valence in the Self condition, in addition to and independently from physiological reactivity. We thus show that HERs represent a trans-domain marker of Self/Other distinction, here specifically contributing to experienced valence. We propose that HERs represent a form of evidence related to the 'I' part of the judgement 'To which extent do I feel happy'. The 'I' related evidence would be combined with the affective evidence collected during affective scene presentation, accounting at least partly for the difference between feeling an emotion and identifying it in someone else.

Indexed as

BrainEmotionsElectroencephalographyEmpathyHappinessHumansElectroencephalographyEmotionEmpathyHeartbeat evoked responsesInteroceptionSelf/other distinction

Identifiers

PMID36610678
PMCPMC9926012
OpenAlexW4313575293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.