Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36610541›Full record

ArticleAppetite2023

Is the effect of menu energy labelling on consumer behaviour equitable? A pooled analysis of twelve randomized control experiments.

Eric Robinson, Emma Boyland, Paul Christiansen, Ann F Haynos, Andrew Jones, Una Masic, Deirdre Robertson, Katy Tapper, Lucile Marty

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Food Environment Assessment in Two Socioeconomic Contexts in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Eric RobinsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: eric.robinson@liv.ac.uk.
Emma BoylandDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Paul ChristiansenDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ann F HaynosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Andrew JonesDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Una MasicGender Identity Development Service, Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, London, UK.
Deirdre RobertsonBehavioural Research Unit, Economic and Social Research Institute, Ireland & School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Katy TapperDepartment of Psychology, City, University of London, UK.
Lucile MartyCentre des Sciences Du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
University of Liverpool · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREconomic and Social Research Institute · IEThe Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Neural Correlates of Reward and Symptom Expression in Anorexia NervosaK23MH112867 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HAYNOS, ANN FRANCES · 2017 to 2021
$878k
Neurobiological and Psychological Maintenance Mechanisms Associated with Anticipatory Reward in Bulimia NervosaR21MH119417 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PETERSON, CAROL B. · 2020 to 2021
$424k
Systems Science and the Dieting Paradox: Investigating the Complex Mechanisms through which Dieting Influences Obesity and Eating Disorder RiskR21DK121242 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SHERWOOD, NANCY E. · 2020 to 2021
$386k
Evaluating the effect of brief interventions on effort to restrict dietary intakeF31MH097450 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI HAYNOS, ANN FRANCES · 2013 to 2014
$35k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK121242NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH097450NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112867NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH119417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menu energy labelling has been implemented as a public health policy to promote healthier dietary choices and reduce obesity. However, it is unclear whether the influence energy labelling has on consumer behaviour differs based on individuals' demographics or characteristics and may therefore produce inequalities in diet. Data were analysed from 12 randomized control trials (N = 8508) evaluating the effect of food and drink energy labelling (vs. labelling absent) on total energy content of food and drink selections (predominantly hypothetical) in European and US adults. Analyses examined the moderating effects of participant age, sex, ethnicity/race, education, household income, body mass index, dieting status, food choice motives and current hunger on total energy content of selections. Energy labelling was associated with a small reduction (f

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorEnergy IntakeAdultDietFemaleFood LabelingFood PreferencesHumansMaleRestaurantsCalorie labelsEnergy labellingIndividual differencesObesity policy

Identifiers

PMID36610541
PMCPMC10082393
OpenAlexW4313597547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.