ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2023
Integrating transformer and autoencoder techniques with spectral graph algorithms for the prediction of scarcely labeled molecular data.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting protein-nucleic acid flexibility using persistent sheaf Laplacians.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026Article
- A review of transformer models in drug discovery and beyond.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Graph-Based Bidirectional Transformer Decision Threshold Adjustment Algorithm for Class-Imbalanced Molecular Data.Journal of computational biophysics and chemistry · 2024Article
- Persistent Laplacian-enhanced algorithm for scarcely labeled data classification.Machine learning · 2024Article
- Synergistic Integration of Deep Neural Networks and Finite Element Method with Applications of Nonlinear Large Deformation Biomechanics.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Small Data Challenges in Molecular Science.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In molecular and biological sciences, experiments are expensive, time-consuming, and often subject to ethical constraints. Consequently, one often faces the challenging task of predicting desirable properties from small data sets or scarcely-labeled data sets. Although transfer learning can be advantageous, it requires the existence of a related large data set. This work introduces three graph-based models incorporating Merriman-Bence-Osher (MBO) techniques to tackle this challenge. Specifically, graph-based modifications of the MBO scheme are integrated with state-of-the-art techniques, including a home-made transformer and an autoencoder, in order to deal with scarcely-labeled data sets. In addition, a consensus technique is detailed. The proposed models are validated using five benchmark data sets. We also provide a thorough comparison to other competing methods, such as support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting decision trees, which are known for their good performance on small data sets. The performances of various methods are analyzed using residue-similarity (R-S) scores and R-S indices. Extensive computational experiments and theoretical analysis show that the new models perform very well even when as little as 1% of the data set is used as labeled data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.