Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36610003›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2023

Lecture capture affects student learning behaviour.

Susanne Voelkel, Andy Bates, Terry Gleave, Carl Larsen, Elliott J Stollar, Gemma Wattret, Luciane V Mello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susanne VoelkelSchool of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5326-2168
Andy BatesSchool of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.
Terry GleaveSchool of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.
Carl LarsenSchool of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.
Elliott J StollarSchool of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.
Gemma WattretSchool of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8497-1370
Luciane V MelloSchool of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8632-1678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lecture capture (the real-time recording of live lectures) has become commonplace in higher education. It is popular with students who like the associated flexibility and believe that lecture recordings improve their grades. Here, we performed a survey (n = 694, 53% of the cohort) and set up focus groups (2 focus groups, 15 participants) to explore biological sciences students' perceptions of how lecture capture impacts their study behaviour when recordings are provided for every lecture and are made available to students without restriction. The participants in our study were convinced that lecture capture improved their learning, and many students noted that they were dependent on the recordings, thinking that without them, they would not be able to achieve good grades. Students reported that they spend a considerable amount of time watching recordings and making verbatim notes, leaving them little time for independent study. For many, lecture capture seems to reinforce the view that memorisation equals learning, a view that may be reinforced by knowledge-focussed assessment formats. For most students, lecture capture did not affect self-reported live lecture attendance patterns. However, about one-third of the participants reported skipping more classes, and the same participants were more likely to postpone catching up on missed lectures. The outcomes of our study suggest that lecture capture provision may negatively affect some students' attendance and study behaviour, and thus, we suggest more needs to be done to mitigate against this.

Indexed as

LearningStudents, MedicalCurriculumEducational MeasurementHumansVideo Recordingbiological scienceseducationlecture podcastlecture recordinglecture screencaststudy behaviour

Identifiers

PMID36610003
PMCPMC9900091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.