Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609643›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2023

A 'print-pause-print' protocol for 3D printing microfluidics using multimaterial stereolithography.

Yong Tae Kim, Alireza Ahmadianyazdi, Albert Folch

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Lithography-based 3D printing of hydrogels.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  18. Microfluidic Nanoparticle Separation for Precision Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  19. Implantable 3D printed hydrogels with intrinsic channels for liver tissue engineering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Biomicrofluidics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yong Tae KimDepartment of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Tech University of Korea, Siheung-si, Republic of Korea. ytkim@tukorea.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-7750-2995
Alireza AhmadianyazdiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Albert FolchDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Microfluidic Device to Profile Chemosensitivity in Glioma Slice CulturesR01CA181445 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FOLCH, ALBERT · 2014 to 2025
$5.3M
Multi-material stereolithographic 3D-printing for prototyping Tissue ChipsR21GM137161 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FOLCH, ALBERT · 2020 to 2021
$416k
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA181445NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181445NIGMS NIH HHS NIGMS R21GM137161NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM137161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods to make microfluidic chips using 3D printers have attracted much attention because these simple procedures allow rapid fabrication of ready-to-use products from digital 3D designs with minimal human intervention. Printing high-resolution chips that are simultaneously transparent, biocompatible and contain regions of dissimilar materials is an ongoing challenge. Transparency allows for the optical inspection of specimens containing cells and labeled biomolecules inside the chip. Being able to use different materials for different layers in the product increases the number of potential applications. In this 'print-pause-print' protocol, we describe detailed strategies for fabricating transparent biomicrofluidic devices and multimaterial chips using stereolithographic 3D printing. To print transparent biomicrofluidic chips, we developed a transparent resin based on poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEG-DA) (average molecular weight: 250 g/mol, PEG-DA-250) and a smooth chip surface technique achieved using glass. Cells can be successfully cultured and visualized on PEG-DA-250 prints and inside PEG-DA-250 microchannels. The multimaterial potential of the technique is exemplified using a molecular diffusion device that comprises parts made of two different materials: the channel walls, which are water impermeable, and a porous barrier structure, which is permeable to small molecules that diffuse through it. The two materials were prepared from two different molecular-weight PEG-DA-based printing resins. Alignment of the two dissimilar material structures is performed automatically by the printer during the printing process, which only requires a simple pause step to exchange the resins. The procedure takes less than 1 h and can facilitate chip-based applications including biomolecule analysis, cell biology, organ-on-a-chip and tissue engineering.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsStereolithographyHumansPolyethylene GlycolsPrinting, Three-Dimensionalpoly(ethylene glycol)diacrylatePolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID36609643
PMCPMC10101882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.