ReviewNature protocols2023
A 'print-pause-print' protocol for 3D printing microfluidics using multimaterial stereolithography.
Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- A fully integrated sample-to-answer diagnostic platform enables rapid quantification of post-transplant infection at the point-of-care.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Defining Operational Limits of Low-Cost MSLA 3D Printing for Microfluidic Systems: Resin Performance, Cell Compatibility, and Fluid Dynamics.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Microfluidic Chip Technology for Laboratory Medicine: Innovations and Artificial Intelligence Integration.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Integrating Optical Feedback Alignment and Fluidic Control for Multiphase Flow-Assisted In Situ 3D Printing.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Mammary Gland Organoid-on-a-Chip for Producing Selected Human Milk Components.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Microfluidic- and Field-Assisted 3D Printing: Leveraging Fluidic Control, Electrokinetic Phenomena, and Other Physical Fields to Advance Additive Manufacturing.Electrophoresis · 2025Review
- Organ-on-a-Chip Models of the Female Reproductive System: Current Progress and Future Perspectives.Micromachines · 2025Review
- 3D-printed plugs enhance cell usage efficiency for single-cell migration and neuron axon guidance assays.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Additive Manufacturing for Nanogenerators: Fundamental Mechanisms, Recent Advancements, and Future Prospects.Nano-micro letters · 2025Review
- Teach your microscope how to print: low-cost and rapid-iteration microfabrication for biology.Lab on a chip · 2025Article
- Advancing Modular Microfluidics: Stereolithographic 3D Printing of Reconfigurable Connectors for Bioanalytical Applications.International journal of bioprinting · 2025Article
- Protein Manipulation via Dielectrophoresis: Theoretical Principles and Emerging Microfluidic Platforms.Micromachines · 2025Review
- The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Review
- Toolkit for integrating millimeter-sized microfluidic biomedical devices with multiple membranes and electrodes.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Biomaterial-assisted organoid technology for disease modeling and drug screening.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Lithography-based 3D printing of hydrogels.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025Article
- Microfluidic Nanoparticle Separation for Precision Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Implantable 3D printed hydrogels with intrinsic channels for liver tissue engineering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methods to make microfluidic chips using 3D printers have attracted much attention because these simple procedures allow rapid fabrication of ready-to-use products from digital 3D designs with minimal human intervention. Printing high-resolution chips that are simultaneously transparent, biocompatible and contain regions of dissimilar materials is an ongoing challenge. Transparency allows for the optical inspection of specimens containing cells and labeled biomolecules inside the chip. Being able to use different materials for different layers in the product increases the number of potential applications. In this 'print-pause-print' protocol, we describe detailed strategies for fabricating transparent biomicrofluidic devices and multimaterial chips using stereolithographic 3D printing. To print transparent biomicrofluidic chips, we developed a transparent resin based on poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEG-DA) (average molecular weight: 250 g/mol, PEG-DA-250) and a smooth chip surface technique achieved using glass. Cells can be successfully cultured and visualized on PEG-DA-250 prints and inside PEG-DA-250 microchannels. The multimaterial potential of the technique is exemplified using a molecular diffusion device that comprises parts made of two different materials: the channel walls, which are water impermeable, and a porous barrier structure, which is permeable to small molecules that diffuse through it. The two materials were prepared from two different molecular-weight PEG-DA-based printing resins. Alignment of the two dissimilar material structures is performed automatically by the printer during the printing process, which only requires a simple pause step to exchange the resins. The procedure takes less than 1 h and can facilitate chip-based applications including biomolecule analysis, cell biology, organ-on-a-chip and tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.