Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609632›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Identification of TP53 mutations in circulating tumour DNA in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma using next generation sequencing technologies.

Leslie Calapre, Tindaro Giardina, Aaron B Beasley, Anna L Reid, Colin Stewart, Benhur Amanuel, Tarek M Meniawy, Elin S Gray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie CalapreSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Tindaro GiardinaAnatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Aaron B BeasleySchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Anna L ReidSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Colin StewartAnatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Benhur AmanuelSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Tarek M MeniawySchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Elin S GraySchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia. e.gray@ecu.edu.au.
Edith Cowan University · AUPathwest Laboratory Medicine · AUQueen Elizabeth II Medical Centre · AUSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been suggested to be a viable biomarker of response to treatment in patients with high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). TP53 mutations are present in more than 90% of HGSOCs but somatic variants are distributed across all exonic regions of the gene, requiring next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies for mutational analysis. In this study, we compared the suitability of the Accel (Swift) and Oncomine (ThermoFisher) panels for identification of TP53 mutations in ctDNA of HGSOC patients (N = 10). Only 6 patients (60%) were found to have TP53 mutations using the ACCEL panel but the addition of molecular tags in the Oncomine panel improved ctDNA detection with at least one mutation detected in all cases (100%). Orthogonal validation of the 14 somatic variants found by Oncomine, using droplet digital PCR, confirmed 79% (11/14) of the identified mutations. Overall, the Oncomine panel with unique molecular identifiers (UMI) appears more useful for ctDNA analysis in HGSOC.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAOvarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationTumor Suppressor Protein p53Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNATP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID36609632
PMCPMC9822997
OpenAlexW4313577433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.