Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609577›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Predictive modeling of optimism bias using gray matter cortical thickness.

Raviteja Kotikalapudi, Dominik A Moser, Mihai Dricu, Tamas Spisak, Tatjana Aue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raviteja KotikalapudiInstitute of Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. raviteja.kotikalapudi@uk-essen.de.
Dominik A MoserInstitute of Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Mihai DricuInstitute of Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Tamas SpisakDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Tatjana AueInstitute of Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. tatjana.aue@psy.unibe.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People have been shown to be optimistically biased when their future outcome expectancies are assessed. In fact, we display optimism bias (OB) toward our own success when compared to a rival individual's (personal OB [POB]). Similarly, success expectancies for social groups we like reliably exceed those we mention for a rival group (social OB [SOB]). Recent findings suggest the existence of neural underpinnings for OB. Mostly using structural/functional MRI, these findings rely on voxel-based mass-univariate analyses. While these results remain associative in nature, an open question abides whether MRI information can accurately predict OB. In this study, we hence used predictive modelling to forecast the two OBs. The biases were quantified using a validated soccer paradigm, where personal (self versus rival) and social (in-group versus out-group) forms of OB were extracted at the participant level. Later, using gray matter cortical thickness, we predicted POB and SOB via machine-learning. Our model explained 17% variance (R

Indexed as

Gray MatterOptimismBiasGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID36609577
PMCPMC9822990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.