Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609574›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

A population-based matched cohort study of major congenital anomalies following COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Clara Calvert, Jade Carruthers, Cheryl Denny, Jack Donaghy, Lisa E M Hopcroft, Leanne Hopkins, Anna Goulding, Laura Lindsay, Terry McLaughlin, Emily Moore and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neonatal and maternal outcomes of mRNA versus Non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Clara CalvertUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3272-1040
Jade CarruthersPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.
Cheryl DennyPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-4616-4732
Jack DonaghyPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.
Lisa E M HopcroftPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-7022-1322
Leanne HopkinsPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-7487-4363
Anna GouldingPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-1288-3256
Laura LindsayPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.
Terry McLaughlinPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.
Emily MoorePublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-9634-3299
Bob TaylorPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-4314-2685
Maria LoaneInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1206-3637
Helen DolkInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK.
Joan MorrisPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7164-612X
Bonnie AuyeungSchool of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1741-0949
Krishnan BhaskaranDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5364-8757
Cheryl L GibbonsPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.
Srinivasa Vittal KatikireddiPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0001-6593-9092
Maureen O'LearyPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0001-6797-9282
David McAllisterSchool of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Ting ShiUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4101-4535
Colin R SimpsonUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-8083
Chris RobertsonPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7022-3056
Sarah J StockUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4308-856X
Rachael WoodUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Rachael.Wood@phs.scot.ORCID 0000-0003-4453-623X
Public Health Scotland · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GBVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SCAF/15/02Medical Research Council MC_PC_19004Medical Research Council MC_PC_19075Medical Research Council MC_PC_20058Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2Wellcome Trust 209560/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence on associations between COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of congenital anomalies is limited. Here we report a national, population-based, matched cohort study using linked electronic health records from Scotland (May 2020-April 2022) to estimate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and, separately, SARS-CoV-2 infection between six weeks pre-conception and 19 weeks and six days gestation and the risk of [1] any major congenital anomaly and [2] any non-genetic major congenital anomaly. Mothers vaccinated in this pregnancy exposure period mostly received an mRNA vaccine (73.7% Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and 7.9% Moderna mRNA-1273). Of the 6731 babies whose mothers were vaccinated in the pregnancy exposure period, 153 had any anomaly and 120 had a non-genetic anomaly. Primary analyses find no association between any vaccination and any anomaly (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.01, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.83-1.24) or non-genetic anomalies (aOR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.81-1.22). Primary analyses also find no association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and any anomaly (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.66-1.60) or non-genetic anomalies (aOR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.57-1.54). Findings are robust to sensitivity analyses. These data provide reassurance on the safety of vaccination, in particular mRNA vaccines, just before or in early pregnancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesBNT162 VaccineCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancySARS-CoV-2VaccinationBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36609574
PMCPMC9821346
OpenAlexW4313650271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.