Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609476›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Direct observation of Cu in high-silica chabazite zeolite by electron ptychography using Wigner distribution deconvolution.

Kazutaka Mitsuishi, Katsuaki Nakazawa, Ryusuke Sagawa, Masahiko Shimizu, Hajime Matsumoto, Hisashi Shima, Takahiko Takewaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kazutaka MitsuishiResearch Center for Advanced Measurement and Characterization, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan. Mitsuishi.Kazutaka@nims.go.jp.
Katsuaki NakazawaInternational Center for Young Scientists (ICYS), National Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan.
Ryusuke SagawaJEOL Ltd., 3-1-2 Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo, 196-8558, Japan.
Masahiko ShimizuResearch Center for Advanced Measurement and Characterization, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan.
Hajime MatsumotoResearch Center for Advanced Measurement and Characterization, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan.
Hisashi ShimaScience and Innovation Center, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, 1000 Kamoshida-cho, Aoba-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takahiko TakewakiScience and Innovation Center, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, 1000 Kamoshida-cho, Aoba-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K04890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct observation of Cu in Cu-chabazite (CHA) zeolite has been achieved by electron ptychography using the Wigner distribution deconvolution. The imaging properties of ptychographically reconstructed images were evaluated by comparing the intensities of six-membered-ring columns of the zeolite with and without Cu using simulated ptychography images. It was concluded that although false contrast may appear at Cu-free columns for some acquisition conditions, ptychography can discriminate columns with and without Cu. Experimental observation of CHA with and without Cu was performed. Images obtained from the Cu-containing sample showed contrast at the six-membered-rings, while no contrast was observed for the Cu-free sample. The results show that ptychography is a promising technique for visualizing the atomic structures of beam-sensitive materials.

Identifiers

PMID36609476
PMCPMC9822938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.