Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609452›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Cingulo-Opercular Subnetworks Motivate Frontoparietal Subnetworks during Distinct Cognitive Control Demands.

Jessica L Wood, Derek Evan Nee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Task-Switch Related Reductions in Neural Distinctiveness in Children and Adults: Commonalities and Differences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Initial learning in the brain: From rules to action.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica L WoodDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4301 jwood@psy.fsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7304-5750
Derek Evan NeeDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4301.

Funding

MEMORYP01NS040813 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2002 to 2012
$12.9M
Working Memory and Prefrontal CortexR01MH063901 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Hierarchical Interactions Supporting Cognitive ControlR01MH121509 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NEE, DEREK EVAN · 2020 to 2025
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063901NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121509NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS040813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control is the ability to flexibly adapt behavior in a goal-directed manner when habit will not suffice. Control can be separated into distinct forms based on the timescale (present-future) and/or medium (external-internal) over which it operates. Both the frontoparietal network (FPN) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) are engaged during control, but their respective functions and interactions remain unclear. Here, we examined activations in the FPN and CON with fMRI in humans (male and female) during a task that manipulated control across timescales/mediums. The findings show that the CON can be distinguished into the following two separable subnetworks mirroring the FPN: a rostral/ventral subnetwork sensitive to future-oriented control involving internal representations, and a caudal/dorsal subnetwork sensitive to present-oriented control involving external representations. Relative to the FPN, activation in the CON was particularly pronounced during transitions into and out of particular control demands. Moreover, the relationship of each CON subnetwork to behavior was mediated by a respective FPN subnetwork. Such data are consistent with the idea that the CON motivates the FPN, which, in turn, drives behavior. Within the CON, the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) mediated the relationship between the anterior insula and FPN, suggesting that the dmPFC acts as the crux that links the CON to the FPN. Collectively, these data indicate that parallel CON-FPN subnetworks mediate controlled behaviors at distinct timescales/mediums.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingCognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal Cortexcognitive controlexecutive functionfMRImotivationnetwork interactionssubnetwork

Identifiers

PMID36609452
PMCPMC9962782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.