ArticleScientific reports2023
Prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction changes in heart failure patients using machine learning and electronic health records: a multi-site study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Echocardiographic Trajectories of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Implementation of Machine Learning in Heart Failure Trials.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Forecasting left ventricular systolic dysfunction in heart failure with artificial intelligence.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Leveraging AI to Enhance Electronic Health Records.EJIFCC · 2025Review
- AI Tools for Heart Failure Management: A Comprehensive Review of Potential, Pitfalls, and Predictive Analytics.Cureus · 2025Review
- EFNet: estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction from cardiac ultrasound videos using deep learning.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Create Predictors, Enhance Molecular Understanding, and Implement Purposeful Programs for Myocardial Recovery.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- BOO-ST and CBCEC: two novel hybrid machine learning methods aim to reduce the mortality of heart failure patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- GENERATOR HEART FAILURE DataMart: An integrated framework for heart failure research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a key measure in the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure (HF) and many patients experience changes in EF overtime. Large-scale analysis of longitudinal changes in EF using electronic health records (EHRs) is limited. In a multi-site retrospective study using EHR data from three academic medical centers, we investigated longitudinal changes in EF measurements in patients diagnosed with HF. We observed significant variations in baseline characteristics and longitudinal EF change behavior of the HF cohorts from a previous study that is based on HF registry data. Data gathered from this longitudinal study were used to develop multiple machine learning models to predict changes in ejection fraction measurements in HF patients. Across all three sites, we observed higher performance in predicting EF increase over a 1-year duration, with similarly higher performance predicting an EF increase of 30% from baseline compared to lower percentage increases. In predicting EF decrease we found moderate to high performance with low confidence for various models. Among various machine learning models, XGBoost was the best performing model for predicting EF changes. Across the three sites, the XGBoost model had an F1-score of 87.2, 89.9, and 88.6 and AUC of 0.83, 0.87, and 0.90 in predicting a 30% increase in EF, and had an F1-score of 95.0, 90.6, 90.1 and AUC of 0.54, 0.56, 0.68 in predicting a 30% decrease in EF. Among features that contribute to predicting EF changes, baseline ejection fraction measurement, age, gender, and heart diseases were found to be statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.