Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609415›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction changes in heart failure patients using machine learning and electronic health records: a multi-site study.

Prakash Adekkanattu, Luke V Rasmussen, Jennifer A Pacheco, Joseph Kabariti, Daniel J Stone, Yue Yu, Guoqian Jiang, Yuan Luo, Pascal S Brandt, Zhenxing Xu and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Prakash AdekkanattuWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA. pra2008@med.cornell.edu.
Luke V RasmussenNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jennifer A PachecoNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joseph KabaritiWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Daniel J StoneThe Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yue YuThe Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Guoqian JiangThe Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yuan LuoNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pascal S BrandtUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Zhenxing XuWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Veer VekariaWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Jie XuWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Fei WangWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Natalie C BendaWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Yifan PengWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Parag GoyalWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Faraz S AhmadNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jyotishman PathakWeill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
Modeling the Incompleteness and Biases of Health DataR01LM013337 · NLM · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LUO, YUAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
Electronic Health Record Nudges to Improve Quality of Care in Heart FailureK23HL155970 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI AHMAD, FARAZ SHAFIQUE · 2021 to 2024
$750k
A framework to enhance radiology structured report by invoking NLP and DL: Models and ApplicationsR00LM013001 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI PENG, YIFAN · 2020 to 2022
$710k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688NLM NIH HHS R00 LM013001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a key measure in the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure (HF) and many patients experience changes in EF overtime. Large-scale analysis of longitudinal changes in EF using electronic health records (EHRs) is limited. In a multi-site retrospective study using EHR data from three academic medical centers, we investigated longitudinal changes in EF measurements in patients diagnosed with HF. We observed significant variations in baseline characteristics and longitudinal EF change behavior of the HF cohorts from a previous study that is based on HF registry data. Data gathered from this longitudinal study were used to develop multiple machine learning models to predict changes in ejection fraction measurements in HF patients. Across all three sites, we observed higher performance in predicting EF increase over a 1-year duration, with similarly higher performance predicting an EF increase of 30% from baseline compared to lower percentage increases. In predicting EF decrease we found moderate to high performance with low confidence for various models. Among various machine learning models, XGBoost was the best performing model for predicting EF changes. Across the three sites, the XGBoost model had an F1-score of 87.2, 89.9, and 88.6 and AUC of 0.83, 0.87, and 0.90 in predicting a 30% increase in EF, and had an F1-score of 95.0, 90.6, 90.1 and AUC of 0.54, 0.56, 0.68 in predicting a 30% decrease in EF. Among features that contribute to predicting EF changes, baseline ejection fraction measurement, age, gender, and heart diseases were found to be statistically significant.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Function, LeftElectronic Health RecordsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStroke Volume

Identifiers

PMID36609415
PMCPMC9822934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.