Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609315›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Complexity and interplay of faced adversities and perceived health and well-being in highly vulnerable pregnant women-the Mothers of Rotterdam program.

L C M Bertens, K S C Mohabier, M van der Hulst, D S E Broekharst, H Ismaili M'hamdi, A Burdorf, R Kok, J P de Graaf, E A P Steegers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L C M BertensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.bertens@erasmusmc.nl.
K S C MohabierDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M van der HulstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
D S E BroekharstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
H Ismaili M'hamdiDepartment of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A BurdorfDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R KokErasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences Clinical, Child and Family Studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J P de GraafDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E A P SteegersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving in socially disadvantaged circumstances has a widespread impact on one's physical and mental health. That is why individuals living in this situation are often considered vulnerable. When pregnant, not only the woman's health is affected, but also that of her (unborn) child. It is well accepted that vulnerable populations experience worse (perinatal) health, however, little is known about the lived adversities and health of these vulnerable individuals.

objectivesWith this article, insights into this group of highly vulnerable pregnant women are provided by describing the adversities these women face and their experienced well-being.

methodsHighly vulnerable women were recruited when referred to tailored social care during pregnancy. Being highly vulnerable was defined as facing at least three different adversities divided over two or more life-domains. The heat map method was used to assess the interplay between adversities from the different life domains. Demographics and results from the baseline questionnaires on self-sufficiency and perceived health and well-being were presented.

resultsNine hundred nineteen pregnant women were referred to social care (2016-2020). Overall, women had a median of six adversities, distributed over four life-domains. The heat map revealed a large variety in lived adversities, which originated from two parental clusters, one dominated by financial adversities and the other by a the combination of a broad range of adversities. The perceived health was moderate, and 25-34% experienced moderate to severe levels of depression, anxiety or stress. This did not differ between the two parental clusters.

conclusionsThis study shows that highly vulnerable pregnant women deal with multiple adversities affecting not only their social and economic position but also their health and well-being.

Indexed as

MothersPregnant PeopleAnxietyChildFemaleHealth StatusHumansParturitionPregnancyAdversityHealthPregnancySocioeconomic disadvantageVulnerable populationsWell-being

Identifiers

PMID36609315
PMCPMC9817271
OpenAlexW4313649170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.