Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609303›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

Neural Dynamics during Binocular Rivalry: Indications from Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus.

Irem Yildirim, Keith A Schneider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Illuminating consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irem YildirimDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716 yildirim@udel.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7362-1655
Keith A SchneiderDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716.ORCID 0000-0001-7120-3380
University of Delaware · US

Funding

Directly testing the magnocellular theory of dyslexiaR01EY028266 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI SCHNEIDER, KEITH ALLAN · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When two sufficiently different stimuli are presented to each eye, perception alternates between them. This binocular rivalry is conceived as a competition for representation in the single stream of visual consciousness. The magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) pathways, originating in the retina, encode disparate information, but their potentially different contributions to binocular rivalry have not been determined. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the human lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), where the M and P neurons are segregated into layers receiving input from a single eye. We had three participants (one male, two females) and used achromatic stimuli to avoid contributions from color opponent neurons that may have confounded previous studies. We observed activity in the eye-specific regions of LGN correlated with perception, with similar magnitudes during rivalry or physical stimuli alternations, also similar in the M and P regions. These results suggest that LGN activity reflects our perceptions during binocular rivalry and is not simply an artifact of color opponency. Further, perception appears to be a global phenomenon in the LGN, not just limited to a single information channel.

Indexed as

Geniculate BodiesVision, BinocularConsciousnessFemaleHumansMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationRetinaVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptionbinocular rivalryfMRIlateral geniculate nucleusmagnocellularparvocellular

Identifiers

PMID36609303
PMCPMC9840381
OpenAlexW4313598694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.