Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36609264›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

The impact of information sources on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in sub-Saharan Africa.

Uchechukwu L Osuagwu, Khathutshelo P Mashige, Godwin Ovenseri-Ogbomo, Esther Awazzi Envuladu, Emmanuel Kwasi Abu, Chundung Asabe Miner, Chikasirimobi G Timothy, Bernadine N Ekpenyong, Raymond Langsi, Onyekachukwu M Amiebenomo and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Twitter reveals spatio-temporal variation in vaccine concerns in Sub-Saharan Africa.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Importance of Targeted Communication Strategies During COVID-19 Vaccination Campaigns in Mozambique: Results of a Mixed-Methods Acceptability Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Uchechukwu L OsuagwuBathurst Rural Clinical School (BRCS), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University Bathurst, Bathurst, NSW, 2795, Australia. l.osuagwu@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1727-6914
Khathutshelo P MashigeAfrican Vision Research Institute, Discipline of Optometry, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 3629, South Africa.
Godwin Ovenseri-OgbomoDepartment of Optometry, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6638-3222
Esther Awazzi EnvuladuDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, 930003, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Kwasi AbuDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, 00233, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-2354-9170
Chundung Asabe MinerDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, 930003, Nigeria.
Chikasirimobi G TimothyDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health sciences, Mzuzu University, P. Bag 201 Luwinga 2,, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Bernadine N EkpenyongAfrican Vision Research Institute, Discipline of Optometry, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 3629, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3531-5577
Raymond LangsiHealth Division, University of Bamenda, Bambili, P. O. Box 39, Cameroon.
Onyekachukwu M AmiebenomoDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Benin, Benin, Nigeria.
Richard OloruntobaSchool of Management and Marketing, Curtin Business School, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6151, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4305-7352
Piwuna Christopher GosonDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
Deborah Donald CharweTanzania Food and Nutrition Center, P. O. Box 977, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-8537-0892
Tanko IshayaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Jos, Jos, 930003, Nigeria.
Kingsley E AghoAfrican Vision Research Institute, Discipline of Optometry, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 3629, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4111-3207
University of Jos · NGCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUCurtin University · AUMzuzu University · MWNew England College of Optometry · USTanzania Food and Nutrition Center · TZThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Bamenda · CMUniversity of Calabar · NGUniversity of Cape Coast · GHUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of the Highlands and Islands · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination remains the most powerful weapon against the emergence of new variants of coronavirus (COVID-19). However, false information about COVID-19 vaccines through various platforms including social media remains a major threat to global public health. This study examined the impact of information sources on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

methodsA validated web-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 14 March to 16 May 2021, and was administered in both French and English to 2572 participants aged 18 years and over. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, medical and vaccination history, and the information sources (mainstream media and social media) used by the participants during the pandemic were obtained. There were three main outcomes: The vaccinated group were those who responded in the affirmation (Yes) to the question of whether they have been vaccinated against COVID-19. Those who responded 'not sure' or 'no' to the question were then asked if they were willing to be vaccinated when the vaccine became available in their home countries. The responses to this follow-up question were used to derive the second and third outcome variables of 'vaccine hesitancy' and 'vaccine resistance', respectively. A series of logistic regression analyses were used to examine the impact of information sources on the three main outcomes.

resultsThe prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the participants was lowest among newspaper readers (42%) and highest among TV (72%) and social media users (73%). The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine-resistance was also lowest among newspaper readers (37%) but highest among social media users (87%). Multivariate analyses revealed that compared to those who did not use these information sources, SSA participants who relied on the radio (aOR 0.83, 95%CI = 0.70, 0.99), TV (aOR 0.80, 95%CI = 0.65, 0.97) and social media (aOR 0.79, 95%CI = 0.65, 0.97) for information during the pandemic were less likely to be hesitant towards taking the vaccines. However, social media users (aOR 2.13, 95%CI = 1.62, 2.80), those who watched TV (aOR 1.40, 95%CI =1.08, 1.80), relied on healthcare workers (HCWs: aOR 1.32, 95%CI = 1.07, 1.63) and families/friends (aOR 1.31, 95%CI = 1.06, 1.61) for COVID-19 related information during the pandemic were more likely to resist taking the COVID vaccines in this study. Participants who relied on the newspaper for information during the pandemic were less likely to resist the vaccines (aOR 0.77, 95%CI = 0.62, 0.95) compared to non-readers of a newspaper.

conclusionWe found that all six information sources except radio were strong predictors of the resistance towards COVID-19 vaccination. Further research on how these channels can be used to improve the availability of reliable healthcare information is needed. Investments in these resources will protect people and empower them to make appropriate choices about their health.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInformation SourcesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAfricaCoronavirusFacebookHealthcare workersLockdownMediaMisinformationRadioSurveyTelevision

Identifiers

PMID36609264
PMCPMC9816548
OpenAlexW4313640414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.