Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36608963›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2023

Injectable and topical local anesthetics for acute dental pain: 2 systematic reviews.

Anna Miroshnychenko, Sara Ibrahim, Maria Azab, Yetiani Roldan, Juan Pablo Diaz Martinez, Divyalakshmi Tamilselvan, Leon He, Olivia Urquhart, Malavika Tampi, Deborah E Polk and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pain management in pediatric age. An update.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anna Miroshnychenko
Sara Ibrahim
Maria Azab
Yetiani Roldan
Juan Pablo Diaz Martinez
Divyalakshmi Tamilselvan
Leon He
Olivia Urquhart
Malavika Tampi
Deborah E Polk
Paul A Moore
Elliott V Hersh
Alonso Carrasco-Labra
Romina Brignardello-Petersen

Funding

Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Acute Dental Pain: Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Using Data Analytics to Target An Implementation StrategyU01FD007151 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CARRASCO-LABRA, ALONSO, POLK, DEBORAH E · 2020 to 2020
$1.5M
FDA HHS U01 FD007151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal anesthesia is essential for pain control in dentistry. The authors assessed the comparative effect of local anesthetics on acute dental pain after tooth extraction and in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the US Clinical Trials registry through November 21, 2020. The authors included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing long- vs short-acting injectable anesthetics to reduce pain after tooth extraction (systematic review 1) and evaluated the effect of topical anesthetics in patients with symptomatic pulpitis (systematic review 2). Pairs of reviewers screened articles, abstracted data, and assessed risk of bias using a modified version of the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool. The authors assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

resultsFourteen RCTs comparing long- vs short-acting local anesthetics suggest that bupivacaine may decrease the use of rescue analgesia and may not result in additional adverse effects (low certainty evidence). Bupivacaine probably reduces the amount of analgesic consumption compared with lidocaine with epinephrine (mean difference, -1.91 doses; 95% CI, -3.35 to -0.46; moderate certainty) and mepivacaine (mean difference, -1.58 doses; 95% CI, -2.21 to -0.95; moderate certainty). Five RCTs suggest that both benzocaine 10% and 20% may increase the number of people experiencing pain reduction compared with placebo when managing acute irreversible pulpitis (low certainty). PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Bupivacaine may be superior to lidocaine with epinephrine and mepivacaine with regard to time to and amount of analgesic consumption. Benzocaine may be superior to placebo in reducing pain for 20 through 30 minutes after application.

Indexed as

Acute PainPulpitisAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalBenzocaineBupivacaineEpinephrineHumansLidocaineMepivacaineAnesthetics, LocalBenzocaineBupivacaineEpinephrineLidocaineMepivacainearticainebenzocainebupivacainelidocainelong-acting local anestheticsmepivacainepost tooth extraction acute painShort-acting local anestheticssymptomatic irreversible pulpitis

Identifiers

PMID36608963
PMCPMC10871026
OpenAlexW4313495484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.