ArticleMedical image analysis2023
Learning to segment fetal brain tissue from noisy annotations.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Roles and applications of artificial intelligence in fetal and placental MRI: a literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Fetal brain MRI atlases and datasets: A review.NeuroImage · 2024Pooled it
- Detailed Delineation of the Fetal Brain in Diffusion MRI via Multi-Task Learning.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a cranial ultrasound imaging-based deep learning model for periventricular-intraventricular haemorrhage detection and grading: a two-centre study.Pediatric radiology · 2025Observational
- Mechanics of the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Sulcal Pits in the Folding Brain.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Detecting microcephaly and macrocephaly from ultrasound images using artificial intelligence.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Towards automatic US-MR fetal brain image registration with learning-based methods.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Multi-Center Fetal Brain Tissue Annotation (FeTA) Challenge 2022 Results.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- MPVT+: a noise-robust training framework for automatic liver tumor segmentation with noisy labels.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Anatomically constrained tractography of the fetal brain.NeuroImage · 2024Article
- Advances in Fetal Brain Imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Characterizing microstructural development in the fetal brain using diffusion MRI from 23 to 36 weeks of gestation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Motivation for using data-driven algorithms in research: A review of machine learning solutions for image analysis of micrographs in neuroscience.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2023Review
- BOUNTI: Brain vOlumetry and aUtomated parcellatioN for 3D feTal MRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Abnormal prenatal brain development in Chiari II malformation.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic fetal brain tissue segmentation can enhance the quantitative assessment of brain development at this critical stage. Deep learning methods represent the state of the art in medical image segmentation and have also achieved impressive results in brain segmentation. However, effective training of a deep learning model to perform this task requires a large number of training images to represent the rapid development of the transient fetal brain structures. On the other hand, manual multi-label segmentation of a large number of 3D images is prohibitive. To address this challenge, we segmented 272 training images, covering 19-39 gestational weeks, using an automatic multi-atlas segmentation strategy based on deformable registration and probabilistic atlas fusion, and manually corrected large errors in those segmentations. Since this process generated a large training dataset with noisy segmentations, we developed a novel label smoothing procedure and a loss function to train a deep learning model with smoothed noisy segmentations. Our proposed methods properly account for the uncertainty in tissue boundaries. We evaluated our method on 23 manually-segmented test images of a separate set of fetuses. Results show that our method achieves an average Dice similarity coefficient of 0.893 and 0.916 for the transient structures of younger and older fetuses, respectively. Our method generated results that were significantly more accurate than several state-of-the-art methods including nnU-Net that achieved the closest results to our method. Our trained model can serve as a valuable tool to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of fetal brain analysis in MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.