Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36607964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Understanding accelerators to improve SDG-related outcomes for adolescents-An investigation into the nature and quantum of additive effects of protective factors to guide policy making.

Lorraine Sherr, Katharina Haag, Mark Tomlinson, William E Rudgard, Sarah Skeen, Franziska Meinck, Stefani M Du Toit, Kathryn J Steventon Roberts, Sarah L Gordon, Chris Desmond and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Accelerating achievement for Africa's adolescents.Contemporary social science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lorraine SherrUniversity College London, Institute for Global Health, London, United Kingdom.
Katharina HaagUniversity College London, Institute for Global Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-7894
Mark TomlinsonDepartment of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Institute for Life Course Health Research, Cape Town, South Africa.
William E RudgardDepartment of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah SkeenDepartment of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Institute for Life Course Health Research, Cape Town, South Africa.
Franziska MeinckSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Stefani M Du ToitDepartment of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Institute for Life Course Health Research, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kathryn J Steventon RobertsUniversity College London, Institute for Global Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1200-5362
Sarah L GordonDepartment of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Institute for Life Course Health Research, Cape Town, South Africa.
Chris DesmondUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Lucie CluverDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence has shown support for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) accelerator concept, which highlights the need to identify interventions or programmatic areas that can affect multiple sustainable development goals (SDGs) at once to boost their achievement. These data have also clearly shown enhanced effects when interventions are used in combination, above and beyond the effect of single interventions. However, detailed knowledge is now required on optimum combinations and relative gain in order to derive policy guidance. Which accelerators work for which outcomes, what combinations are optimum, and how many combinations are needed to maximise effect? The current study utilised pooled data from the Young Carers (n = 1402) and Child Community Care (n = 446) studies. Data were collected at baseline (n = 1848) and at a 1 to 1.5- year follow-up (n = 1740) from children and young adolescents aged 9-13 years, living in South Africa. Measures in common between the two databases were used to generate five accelerators (caregiver praise, caregiver monitoring, food security, living in a safe community, and access to community-based organizations) and to investigate their additive effects on 14 SDG-related outcomes. Predicted probabilities and predicted probability differences were calculated for each SDG outcome under the presence of none to five accelerators to determine optimal combinations. Results show that various accelerator combinations are effective, though different combinations are needed for different outcomes. Some accelerators ramified across multiple outcomes. Overall, the presence of up to three accelerators was associated with marked improvements over multiple outcomes. The benefit of targeting access to additional accelerators, with additional costs, needs to be weighed against the relative gains to be achieved with high quality but focused interventions. In conclusion, the current data show the detailed impact of various protective factors and provides implementation guidance for policy makers in targeting and distributing interventions to maximise effect and expenditure. Future work should investigate multiplicative effects and synergistic interactions between accelerators.

Indexed as

Policy MakingSustainable DevelopmentAdolescentChildHumansProbabilityProtective FactorsUnited Nations

Identifiers

PMID36607964
PMCPMC9821522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.