SynthesisAdvances in therapy2023
Measuring Self-management Among People with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Diabetes-Specific Instruments in English and Chinese.
Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of behavior-related self-management assessment instruments for patients with diabetes.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Development and validation of a Chinese insulin medication literacy scale for patients with diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of the Number of Needle Tip Bevels on the Exerted Forces and Energy in Insulin Pen Injections.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective behavioral management is critical for people with diabetes to achieve glycemic control. Many instruments have been developed to measure diabetes-specific self-management. This review aimed to retrieve existing self-management-related instruments and identify well-validated instruments suitable for clinical research and practice.
methodsFirst, PubMed, Psych INFO, ERIC, and two Chinese databases (CNKI and Wanfang Data) were searched to identify existing instruments for self-management in diabetes systematically. Second, instruments were screened based on the pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Third, the psychometric property data of each included instrument were retrieved, and instruments with poor psychometric properties were excluded. Fourth, selected instruments were categorized into four categories: knowledge and health literacy, belief and self-efficacy, self-management behaviors, and composite scales. Finally, recommendations were made according to the application status and quality of the instruments. Instruments in English and Chinese were screened and summarized separately.
resultsA total of 406 instruments (339 English instruments and 67 Chinese instruments) were identified. Forty-three English instruments were included. Five focused on knowledge and literacy, 12 on belief and self-management perception-related constructs, 21 on self-management and behaviors, and 5 on composite measures. We further recommended 19 English scales with relatively good quality and are frequently applied. Twenty-five Chinese instruments were included, but none were recommended because of a lack of sufficient psychometric property data.
conclusionMany English instruments measuring diabetes self-management have been developed and validated. Further research is warranted to validate instruments adapted or developed in the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.