ArticleForensic toxicology2023
Urinary profiles of methoxyphenamine and its metabolite after inhalation of methoxyphenamine smoke in humans: aiming to distinguish between active and passive exposure.
Article in Forensic toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMethamphetamine (METH) is commonly abused through smoking. However, the lack of evidence regarding differences in urinary METH excretion after its active and passive inhalation has resulted in complications where the accused claims passive exposure. This study aimed to determine the differences in urinary excretion after active and passive inhalation of the drug, using methoxyphenamine (MPA) as a model for METH.
methodsBody temperature and locomotor activity were measured in mice as indicators of central nervous system toxicity. Six healthy adult male subjects were exposed to passive or active inhalation of MPA smoke in a small room, and urine samples were taken. MPA concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
resultsThere were no signs of toxicity in mice exposed to MPA smoke, ensuring the safety of the clinical study. Urinary MPA concentrations were significantly lower with passive inhalation compared with those of active inhalation. The maximum urinary MPA concentration in passive inhalation was 13.4 ng/mL, which was 1/60 of active inhalation with 800 ng/mL. The urinary excretion in passive inhalation until 24 h was 8.21 μg, which was 1/76 of active inhalation with 625 μg.
conclusionsSince METH and MPA are expected to be excreted similarly, urinary METH concentrations in passively exposed persons are expected to be lower than the cutoff value of the screening kit. If the urine screening test is positive, the suspect should be considered a METH user. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031210604, registration date: Feb. 9, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.