Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36607427›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2023

Time distortions induced by high-arousing emotional compared to low-arousing neutral faces: an event-related potential study.

Maryam Hosseini Houripasand, Saied Sabaghypour, Farhad Farkhondeh Tale Navi, Mohammad Ali Nazari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maryam Hosseini HouripasandDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Saied SabaghypourDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Farhad Farkhondeh Tale NaviDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Ali NazariDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Hemmat Highway, Tehran, 144961-4535, Iran. nazaripsycho@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0340-994X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotions influence our perception of time. Arousal and valence are considered different dimensions of emotions that might interactively affect the perception of time. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the possible time distortions induced by emotional (happy/angry) high-arousing faces compared to neutral, low-arousing faces. Previous works suggested that emotional stimuli enhance the amplitudes of several posterior components, such as Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) and Late Positive Potential (LPP). These components reflect several stages of emotional processing. To this end, we conducted an event-related potential (ERP) study with a temporal bisection task. We hypothesized that the partial dissociation of these ERP components would shed more light on the possible relations of valence and arousal on emotional facial regulation and their consequential effects on behavioral timing. The behavioral results demonstrated a significant effect for emotional stimuli, as happy faces were overestimated relative to angry faces. Our results also indicated higher temporal sensitivity for angry faces. The analyzed components (EPN and LLP) provided further insights into the qualitative differences between stimuli. Finally, the results were interpreted considering the internal clock model and two-stage processing of emotional stimuli.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEmotionsAngerEvoked PotentialsFacial ExpressionHappinessHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.