Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36605777›Full record

ArticleIllness, crises, and loss2023

Diarised Reflections on COVID-19 and Bereavement: Disruptions and Affordances.

Karen West, Hannah Rumble, Rachel Shaw, Ailsa Cameron, Caity Roleston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Illness, crises, and loss, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phenomenological reflections on grief during the COVID-19 pandemic.Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen WestSchool for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-8002
Hannah RumblePolicy Studies, University of Bristol School for Policy Studies, Bristol, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-8194
Rachel ShawAston University School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ailsa CameronUniversity of Bristol School for Policy Studies, Bristol, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Caity RolestonAston University School of Languages and Social Sciences, Birmingham, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 lockdown and social distancing measures have restricted funerals and memorial events and have limited the face-to-face social networks that grieving people might normally be able to draw upon for emotional support. However, while there is considerable expert informed speculation about the impacts of grief and "COVID bereavement", detailed accounts of experiences of bereavement and bereavement support during the pandemic have the potential to enrich and provide nuance and subtlety to the evidence base. This paper draws on diary accounts of bereavement support volunteers in the UK, who have been providing support for the bereaved through these challenging times. These reveal layers of complexity to the experiences of loss, grief and bereavement during these extraordinary times. However, they also point to a number of additional themes that lend a more positive valence to the suspension of normal social expectations and memorial practices associated with the pandemic, which, we argue should be reflected upon for their potential to address the discontents of contemporary governance of end of life and bereavement.

Indexed as

bereavementcompassionate communitiesCOVID-19deathgrief

Identifiers

PMID36605777
PMCPMC9637909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.