Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36605721›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022

Advances in artificial intelligence applications for ocular surface diseases diagnosis.

Yuke Ji, Sha Liu, Xiangqian Hong, Yi Lu, Xingyang Wu, Kunke Li, Keran Li, Yunfang Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuke JiThe Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Bigdata in Ophthalmology, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Sha LiuThe Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Bigdata in Ophthalmology, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiangqian HongShenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Yi LuShenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Xingyang WuShenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Kunke LiShenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Keran LiThe Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Bigdata in Ophthalmology, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yunfang LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, with the rapid development of computer technology, continual optimization of various learning algorithms and architectures, and establishment of numerous large databases, artificial intelligence (AI) has been unprecedentedly developed and applied in the field of ophthalmology. In the past, ophthalmological AI research mainly focused on posterior segment diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy of prematurity, age-related macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion, and glaucoma optic neuropathy. Meanwhile, an increasing number of studies have employed AI to diagnose ocular surface diseases. In this review, we summarize the research progress of AI in the diagnosis of several ocular surface diseases, namely keratitis, keratoconus, dry eye, and pterygium. We discuss the limitations and challenges of AI in the diagnosis of ocular surface diseases, as well as prospects for the future.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedisease diagnosisdry eyekeratitiskeratoconusocular surface diseasepterygium

Identifiers

PMID36605721
PMCPMC9808405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.