ArticleBiotechnologia2021
Screening and identification of abiotic stress-responsive efficient antifungal
Article in Biotechnologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria as a Strategy to Enhance Enzymatic and Metabolic Tolerance ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Ameliorative effects of endophytes on morphological, biochemical and molecular changes inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Article
- Metformin as a novel organic foliar bio-stimulant to enhance peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) growth and yield under drought stress conditions.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Impact of salinity on the morpho-biochemical traits of hydroponically cultivatedBiotechnologia · 2025Article
- ABP-B9, a new strain ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Exploration of phytate-mineralizing bacteria with multifarious plant growth-promoting traits.Biotechnologia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are a collection of microorganisms often used to support and promote plant development and combat plant infectious diseases with various biological control methods. The most significant restricting factors for agricultural productivity worldwide are abiotic constraints. In the present study, seven bacterial isolates from the rice rhizosphere were selected for detailed tests based on results obtained in experiments determining the ACC deaminase synthesis and drought tolerance at -0.30 MPa PEG level. Screening results of the stress tolerance analysis of the seven isolates for elevated temperature (50°C), alkalinity (10% NaCl), and drought (-1.2 MPa) showed that abiotic stress resistance was less prevalent in DRO2, DRO13, and DRO43 isolates than in DRO17, DRO28, DRO35, and DRO51 isolates. During the study, it was observed that DRO17, DRO28, and DRO51 tended to maintain similar cell density at -0.73 MPa PEG level, as observed at -0.30 MPa stress condition. No bacterial growth was observed at higher PEG level (-1.12 MPa) for any bacterial isolate. Four strains of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.