ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2023
A review of custom implants for glenoid bone deficiency in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with total humeral head autograft surgical technique for subtotal glenoid bone loss.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Biomechanics of custom glenoid components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-a narrative review of concepts for surgeons.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Survivorship, complications, and outcomes of custom glenoid implants in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- A review of patient matched implants for shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2025Review
- Current concepts in patient specific implants for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2025Review
- Current trends in shoulder arthroplasty - Are the trends backed by evidence?Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- The effect of eccentric glenoid reaming in reverse shoulder artrhoplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty is being increasingly performed, with indications in both elective and trauma settings. Accordingly, there are an increasing number of revision cases where glenoid bone loss is a concern. There are well recognised surgical techniques for dealing with mild to moderate glenoid wear, including eccentric reaming and impaction grafting. In cases of severe wear or uncontained glenoid defects these may not be suitable, and the surgeon may look to a customised implant to deal with such bone loss. There are several implant manufacturers who currently market and produce patient specific instrumentation and customised glenoid baseplates to achieve the best possible fixation in cases of severe bone loss. This article outlines some examples of custom implants currently available to surgeons, and the process by which they may be procured and used. Implant and surgical considerations, and key aspects of surgical technique are also covered. Literature on outcomes and complications following custom shoulder arthroplasty shows promising results, but at present is limited to relatively small case series with no long-term outcome data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.