ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Application of machine learning techniques in real-world research to predict the risk of liver metastasis in rectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The application of random forest-based models in prognostication of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting colorectal cancer metastases: A comprehensive review.European journal of radiology open · 2026Review
- Interpretable AI-driven prediction of early postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer using the Systemic Inflammatory-Nutritional Index (SINTI): A multi-center study and clinical web tool.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting brain metastasis in breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine-learning model based on dynamic tumor markers in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in unresected colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning-enabled prediction of bone metastasis in esophageal cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Distant Metastasis of T1 and T2 Gallbladder Cancer Based on SEER Database.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Machine learning identifies a 5-serum cytokine panel for the early detection of chronic atrophy gastritis patients.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The liver is the most common site of distant metastasis in rectal cancer, and liver metastasis dramatically affects the treatment strategy of patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction model based on machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of liver metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: We integrated two rectal cancer cohorts from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Chinese multicenter hospitals from 2010-2017. We also built and validated liver metastasis prediction models for rectal cancer using six machine learning algorithms, including random forest (RF), light gradient boosting (LGBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression (LR), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). The models were evaluated by combining several metrics, such as the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy score, sensitivity, specificity and F1 score. Finally, we created a network calculator using the best model. Results: The study cohort consisted of 19,958 patients from the SEER database and 924 patients from two hospitals in China. The AUC values of the six prediction models ranged from 0.70 to 0.95. The XGB model showed the best predictive power, with the following metrics assessed in the internal test set: AUC (0.918), accuracy (0.884), sensitivity (0.721), and specificity (0.787). The XGB model was assessed in the outer test set with the following metrics: AUC (0.926), accuracy (0.919), sensitivity (0.740), and specificity (0.765). The XGB algorithm also shows a good fit on the calibration decision curves for both the internal test set and the external validation set. Finally, we constructed an online web calculator using the XGB model to help generalize the model and to assist physicians in their decision-making better. Conclusion: We successfully developed an XGB-based machine learning model to predict liver metastasis from rectal cancer, which was also validated with a real-world dataset. Finally, we developed a web-based predictor to guide clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.