Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36605386›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2022

Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Comprehensive assessment between the different microsurgical transcranial approaches and the Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches, systematic review and metanalysis on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Juan Carlos Roa Montes de Oca, Jesús María Gonçalves Estella, Ana Belén Nieto-Librero, Purificación Galindo-Villardón, Carlos Julio Roa Ramírez, Jaime Gonçalves Sánchez, Moncef Berhouma, Jan Frederick Cornelius, Roy Thomas Daniel, Idoya Zazpe and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Juan Carlos Roa Montes de OcaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Jesús María Gonçalves EstellaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Ana Belén Nieto-LibreroDepartment of Statistics, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Purificación Galindo-VillardónDepartment of Statistics, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Carlos Julio Roa RamírezDepartment of Neuroradiology. Policlinica San Javier, Barquisimeto, Venezuela.
Jaime Gonçalves SánchezDepartment of Cellular Biology and Pathology, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Moncef BerhoumaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.
Jan Frederick CorneliusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Roy Thomas DanielDepartment of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland.
Idoya ZazpeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain.
Sébastien FroelichDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Emmanuel JouanneauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France.
Diego MazzatentaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Sciences Institut IRCCS, Bologna, Italy.
Mahmoud MessererDepartment of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland.
Torstein MelingDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dimitrios ParaskevopoulosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, St. Bartolomew's and the Royal London Hospital, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, QMUL, London, UK.
Pierre-Hugues RocheDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Henry Werner Siegfried SchroederDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.
Marcos TatagibaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Massimilliano VisocchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosurgery Catholic University of Rome, Italy.
Eduard VoormolenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
Kasper EkkehardDepartment of Neurosurgery, Steward Medical Group, Brighton, USA.
Michaël BruneauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•OGM surgery is much more complex than a simple debate of "from above or from below" (transcranial vs endoscopic).•Lateral Sub-frontal and Superior Interhemispheric seem the most effective, superior and versatile approaches for OGM.•Minimally Invasive Transcranial approaches showed no inferiority in OGM sized <4 ​cm.•Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches showed inferior results in surgical and in functional outcomes for OGM.

Indexed as

Olfactory groove meningiomas transcranial endoscopic endonasal

Identifiers

PMID36605386
PMCPMC9808463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.