ArticleEJIFCC2022
A Case of Clinical Confusion Due to Erroneous M-protein Quantifications: To Splice or Skim?
Article in EJIFCC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- An odyssey of monoclonal gammopathies: focusing on precursors and the progression from MGUS and SMM to multiple Myeloma, with a brief overview of novel therapeutic strategies.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An M-protein identified on electrophoresis is conventionally quantified by integrating the M-spike from baseline (PD), invariably including some irrelevant/background proteins. The use of an alternative approach that skims the M-spike tangentially thereby excluding the background proteins (TS), however, has been scanty. We report herein a case in which PD overestimated the M-proteins inconsistently, leading to confusion over relapse in a multiple myeloma patient. At diagnosis, a 65-year old male had an IgG kappa M-spike of 44 g/L which decreased to 6 g/L (PD) following chemotherapy. Six weeks after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), two M-spikes measuring respectively 10 and 5 g/L emerged. Together with decreases in hemoglobin and blood cell counts, a relapse was suspected. Bone marrow examinations, however, did not reveal any significant plasmacytosis or clonal restriction. Re-analyses by TS reduced the original M-protein estimations by 12% and 88% pre- and post-ASCT respectively, and corroborated the disease activity/status consistently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36605304PMC9768617W4313655537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.