Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36605129›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

RH5.1-CyRPA-Ripr antigen combination vaccine shows little improvement over RH5.1 in a preclinical setting.

Julie Healer, Jennifer K Thompson, Karen L Mackwell, Cecille D Browne, Benjamin A Seager, Anna Ngo, Kym N Lowes, Sarah E Silk, David Pulido, Lloyd D W King and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Julie HealerThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Jennifer K ThompsonThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Karen L MackwellThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Cecille D BrowneLeidos Life Sciences, Frederick, MD, United States.
Benjamin A SeagerThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Anna NgoThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Kym N LowesThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sarah E SilkDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David PulidoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Lloyd D W KingDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jayne M ChristenLeidos Life Sciences, Frederick, MD, United States.
Amy R NoeLeidos Life Sciences, Frederick, MD, United States.
Vinayaka KotraiahLeidos Life Sciences, Frederick, MD, United States.
Paul J MasendyczThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Rajkannan RajagopalanIMV, Inc., Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
Leanne LucasIMV, Inc., Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
Marianne M StanfordIMV, Inc., Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
Lorraine SoissonMalaria Vaccine Development Program, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC, United States.
Carter DiggsMalaria Vaccine Development Program, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC, United States.
Robin MillerMalaria Vaccine Development Program, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC, United States.
Susan YoullMalaria Vaccine Development Program, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC, United States.
Kaye WycherleyThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Simon J DraperDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alan F CowmanThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AULeidos (United States) · USUnited States Agency for International Development · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: RH5 is the leading vaccine candidate for the Plasmodium falciparum blood stage and has shown impact on parasite growth in the blood in a human clinical trial. RH5 binds to Ripr and CyRPA at the apical end of the invasive merozoite form, and this complex, designated RCR, is essential for entry into human erythrocytes. RH5 has advanced to human clinical trials, and the impact on parasite growth in the blood was encouraging but modest. This study assessed the potential of a protein-in-adjuvant blood stage malaria vaccine based on a combination of RH5, Ripr and CyRPA to provide improved neutralizing activity against P. falciparum in vitro. Methods: Mice were immunized with the individual RCR antigens to down select the best performing adjuvant formulation and rats were immunized with the individual RCR antigens to select the correct antigen dose. A second cohort of rats were immunized with single, double and triple antigen combinations to assess immunogenicity and parasite neutralizing activity in growth inhibition assays. Results: The DPX® platform was identified as the best performing formulation in potentiating P. falciparum inhibitory antibody responses to these antigens. The three antigens derived from RH5, Ripr and CyRPA proteins formulated with DPX induced highly inhibitory parasite neutralising antibodies. Notably, RH5 either as a single antigen or in combination with Ripr and/or CyRPA, induced inhibitory antibodies that outperformed CyRPA, Ripr. Conclusion: An RCR combination vaccine may not induce substantially improved protective immunity as compared with RH5 as a single immunogen in a clinical setting and leaves the development pathway open for other antigens to be combined with RH5 as a next generation malaria vaccine.

Indexed as

Malaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanHumansMicePlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsRatsVaccines, CombinedAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsVaccines, CombinedCyRPAmalariamerozoite invasionPlasmodium falciparumRH5 complexRiprvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36605129
PMCPMC9807911
OpenAlexW4313432281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.