Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36605116›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022

Independent assessment of a deep learning system for lymph node metastasis detection on the Augmented Reality Microscope.

David Jin, Joseph H Rosenthal, Elaine E Thompson, Jared Dunnmon, Arash Mohtashamian, Daniel Ward, Ryan Austin, Hassan Tetteh, Niels H Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David JinThe MITRE Corporation, 7525 Colshire Dr, McLean, VA, USA.
Joseph H RosenthalThe Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, 6720A Rockledge Dr, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Elaine E ThompsonThe Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, 6720A Rockledge Dr, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jared DunnmonDefense Innovation Unit, 230 RT Jones Rd, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Arash MohtashamianNaval Hospital Camp Pendleton, 200 Mercy Cir, Oceanside, CA, USA.
Daniel WardNaval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA, USA.
Ryan AustinNaval Hospital Camp Pendleton, 200 Mercy Cir, Oceanside, CA, USA.
Hassan TettehDoD Chief Digital and AI Office, 5615 Columbia Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041, USA.
Niels H OlsonDefense Innovation Unit, 230 RT Jones Rd, Mountain View, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several machine learning algorithms have demonstrated high predictive capability in the identification of cancer within digitized pathology slides. The Augmented Reality Microscope (ARM) has allowed these algorithms to be seamlessly integrated within the pathology workflow by overlaying their inferences onto its microscopic field of view in real time. We present an independent assessment of the LYmph Node Assistant (LYNA) models, state-of-the-art algorithms for the identification of breast cancer metastases in lymph node biopsies, optimized for usage on the ARM. We assessed the models on 40 whole slide images at the commonly used objective magnifications of 10×, 20×, and 40×. We analyzed their performance across clinically relevant subclasses of tissue, including breast cancer, lymphocytes, histiocytes, blood, and fat. Each model obtained overall AUC values of approximately 0.98, accuracy values of approximately 0.94, and sensitivity values above 0.88 at classifying small regions of a field of view as benign or cancerous. Across tissue subclasses, the models performed most accurately on fat and blood, and least accurately on histiocytes, germinal centers, and sinus. The models also struggled with the identification of isolated tumor cells, especially at lower magnifications. After testing, we reviewed the discrepancies between model predictions and ground truth to understand the causes of error. We introduce a distinction between

Indexed as

Breast cancer metastasisMachine learningMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID36605116
PMCPMC9808066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.