ArticleCureus2022
Examination of Ankle Trauma in United States Military Members: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Military members, along with their injuries and expectations to return to duty, vary significantly from the general population. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine current literature pertaining to ankle injuries in United States military members and identify the research gaps. A scoping review was carried out with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was utilized on three databases: PubMed, AMED, and Cochrane Library. The papers included were those of ankle injuries in the military. Exclusionary criteria included papers that did not have quantitative data, no full paper availability and non-US military. One hundred and fifty articles were screened, with nine meeting the inclusion criteria. Almost all of these were cohort by design. The focus was on a variety of tests for returning to active duty and the risks associated with individual factors for each service member. The study identified a lack of randomized control trials, underrepresentation of vulnerable subgroups within the US military, and no single test for ankle mobility and strength to return to duty. Prioritizing these deficiencies may help to save time and money within the US military healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.