Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604966›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

The Rise of Extracellular Vesicles as New Age Biomarkers in Cancer Diagnosis: Promises and Pitfalls.

Suraj Bamankar, Vaishali Yogesh Londhe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Exosomal ncRNAs in reproductive cancers†.Biology of reproduction · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Extracellular Vesicle Preparation and Analysis: A State-of-the-Art Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Non-Genomic Hallmarks of Aging-The Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suraj Bamankar539694Shobhaben Pratapbhai Patel School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM's NMIMS, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vaishali Yogesh Londhe539694Shobhaben Pratapbhai Patel School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM's NMIMS, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3718-9858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-to-cell interactions in the intricate microenvironment of tissue have a significant impact on the progression of cancer at every stage. Both cancer cells and stromal cells are responsible for the secretion of soluble chemical compounds as well as membrane-encased components, which both influence and govern the cell-to-cell interactions within the micro-environment of tumor cells. These membrane structures are identified as extracellular vesicles (EVs), which include exosomes and microvesicles. These nanosized vesicles are made up of bilayered proteolipids and have dimensions ranging from 50 to 1000 nm. It has been speculated that extracellular vesicles that originate from cancer cells perform a variety of functions in the development and progression of cancer which may involve the transport of regulatory materials, such as oncogenic proteins between nearby cells and to distant biological locations. In addition, their level in the serum of cancer patients is noticeably higher than those of healthy controls. The release of extracellular vesicles into the extracellular space is a continual process in both healthy and diseased cells. These extracellular vesicles hold molecular signatures that are defining features of health as well as disease. And hence, the EVs present in biological fluids provide unparalleled and noninvasive access to the necessary molecular details about the health status of the cells. Recent discoveries about these complex extracellular organelles have accelerated the discovery of cancer-specific biological markers as well as the development of unique diagnostic tools based on extracellular vesicles. In this mini-review, we aim to highlight the hopes and hypes associated with the applications of extracellular vesicles as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Cell-Derived MicroparticlesExosomesExtracellular VesiclesNeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkersbiomarkerscancerdiagnosisEVsextracellular vesicles

Identifiers

PMID36604966
PMCPMC9830000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.