Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604725›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2023

Edible insect biodiversity and anthropo-entomophagy practices in Kalehe and Idjwi territories, D.R. Congo.

Jackson Ishara, Marcellin C Cokola, Ariel Buzera, Mercy Mmari, David Bugeme, Saliou Niassy, Karume Katcho, John Kinyuru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jackson IsharaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Université Evangélique en Afrique, P.O. Box 3323, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. jackishara17@uea.ac.cd.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4789-4040
Marcellin C CokolaDepartment of Crop Sciences, Université Evangélique en Afrique, P.O Box: 3323, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5429-0483
Ariel BuzeraDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Université Evangélique en Afrique, P.O. Box 3323, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-8358
Mercy MmariDepartment of Biological and Food Sciences, The Open University of Tanzania, P.O. BOX 23409, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9034-7478
David BugemeCrop Production and Protection Unit, Université Catholique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Saliou NiassyInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1061-4041
Karume KatchoDepartment of Crop Sciences, Université Evangélique en Afrique, P.O Box: 3323, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1146-8808
John KinyuruDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-5599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocated in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (South-Kivu), Kalehe and Idjwi are two relatively unexplored territories with little to no research on edible insects even though anthropo-entomophagy practice is widespread. This study therefore aimed at exploring the biodiversity, perception, consumption, availability, host plants, harvesting techniques, and processing techniques of edible insects.

methodsData were collected through a field survey using three techniques, namely structured interviews, direct observations, and insect collection and taxonomy. A total of 260 respondents, 130 in each territory, were interviewed. The field survey focused on inventorying commonly edible insects as well as recording consumer preferences, preference factors, seasonal availability, host plants, harvesting techniques, and processing and preservation methods. Samples for taxonomic characterization were preserved in 70% alcohol.

resultsNine edible insects, namely Ruspolia differens Serville 1838, Gryllotalpa Africana Palisot de Beauvois 1805, Locusta migratoria Linnaeus 1758, Macrotermes subhyalinus Rambur 1842, Gnathocera trivittata Swederus 1787, Rhynchophorus phoenicis Fabricius 1801, Vespula spp. Linnaeus 1758, Apis mellifera Linnaeus 1758, and Imbrasia oyemensis Rougeot 1955, were recorded as being consumed either as larvae, pupae, and adults. Ruspolia differens and M. subhyalinus were reported as the most preferred by consumers in the studied territories. A scatter plot of matrices and Pearson's correlations showed a negative correlation between preference based on taste, size, and shape, as well as perceived nutritional value. Their seasonal availability differs from one species to another and correlated with host plants availability. Harvesting techniques and processing and preservation methods depend on species, local knowledge, and practices.

conclusionThe huge edible insect diversity observed in Kalehe and Idjwi is evidence of anthropo-entomophagy practices in the area. In addition to being an important delicacy and traditional foods, edible insects can contribute to food, environmental, and financial security through local business opportunities. Households can rely on edible insects to meet their nutritional needs instead of conventional livestock. Indigenous practices and technologies used for harvesting, processing, and preserving edible insects must be improved to meet international standards to increase the market and capitalize on the economic potential of edible insects.

Indexed as

Edible InsectsAnimalsBeesDemocratic Republic of the CongoFoodInsectaLarvaAnthropo-entomophagyBiodiversityEdible insectsHarvesting techniquesHost plantsProcessing methodsSeasonal availability

Identifiers

PMID36604725
PMCPMC9817319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.