Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604687›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Dosimetric comparison of deformable image registration and synthetic CT generation based on CBCT images for organs at risk in cervical cancer radiotherapy.

Yankui Chang, Yongguang Liang, Bo Yang, Jie Qiu, Xi Pei, Xie George Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adaptive assessment based on fractional CBCT images for cervical cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yankui Chang *School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Yongguang Liang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bo YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. qj_ww@139.com.
Xi PeiSchool of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Xie George XuSchool of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China. xgxu@ustc.edu.cn.
University of Science and Technology of China · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAnatomical variations existing in cervical cancer radiotherapy treatment can be monitored by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Deformable image registration (DIR) from planning CT (pCT) to CBCT images and synthetic CT (sCT) image generation based on CBCT are two methods for improving the quality of CBCT images. This study aims to compare the accuracy of these two approaches geometrically and dosimetrically in cervical cancer radiotherapy.

methodsIn this study, 40 paired pCT-CBCT images were collected to evaluate the accuracy of DIR and sCT generation. The DIR method was based on a 3D multistage registration network that was trained with 150 paired pCT-CBCT images, and the sCT generation method was performed based on a 2D cycle-consistent adversarial network (CycleGAN) with 6000 paired pCT-CBCT slices for training. Then, the doses were recalculated with the CBCT, pCT, deformed pCT (dpCT) and sCT images by a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose code, ArcherQA, to obtain Dose

resultsThe global gamma pass rate of Dose

conclusionsFor cervical cancer radiotherapy, the DIR method and sCT generation could produce similar precise dose distributions, but sCT contours had higher accuracy when the difference in planning CT and CBCT was large.

Indexed as

Spiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedCBCTCervical cancerDeformable image registrationDosimetric comparisonsCT generation

Identifiers

PMID36604687
PMCPMC9817400
OpenAlexW4313560551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.