Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604685›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2023

Delivering the Thinking Healthy Programme as a universal group intervention integrated into routine antenatal care: a randomized-controlled pilot study.

Perran Boran, Melike Dönmez, Ezgi Barış, Mahmut Caner Us, Zeynep Meva Altaş, Anum Nisar, Najia Atif, Siham Sikander, Seyhan Hıdıroğlu, Dilşad Save and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04819711 (Addressing Perinatal Depression in Deprived Areas of Istanbul, Turkey), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04819711 nacompletednot on this map

Addressing Perinatal Depression in Deprived Areas of Istanbul, Turkey: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPerran BoranRan2021 to 2021Enrolled88ConditionsPerinatal DepressionArmsThinking Healthy Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological sleep interventions in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Perran BoranMarmara University, School of Medicine, Division of Social Pediatrics, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9885-7656
Melike DönmezMarmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6848-5516
Ezgi BarışMarmara University, School of Medicine, Division of Social Pediatrics, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-8002
Mahmut Caner UsMarmara University, Institute of Health Sciences, Social Pediatrics Doctorate Program, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1120-3498
Zeynep Meva AltaşMarmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0475-8946
Anum NisarSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0862-0303
Najia AtifHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-9356
Siham SikanderHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0223-7234
Seyhan HıdıroğluMarmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8656-4613
Dilşad SaveMarmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5252-5189
Atif RahmanUniversity of Liverpool, Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Waterhouse Buildings Block B, Liverpool, L69 3LH, UK. atifr@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2066-4467
Marmara University · TRHuman Development Research Foundation · PKUniversity of Liverpool · GBXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T038616/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with perinatal depression and their children are at increased risk of poor health outcomes. There is a need to implement non-stigmatizing interventions into existing health systems which reduce psychosocial distress during pregnancy and prevent perinatal depression. We adapted the WHO-endorsed Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) to be delivered universally to all women attending routine online pregnancy schools in Istanbul, Turkey. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention.

methodsThis mixed-methods study incorporated a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial and qualitative evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted THP - Brief Group version (THP-BGV) to a range of stakeholders. We recruited pregnant women at 12-30 weeks' gestation through pregnancy schools within the University Hospital's catchment area. Women in the intervention arm received five online sessions of the THP-BGV delivered by antenatal nurses. The intervention employed principles of cognitive behaviour therapy to provide psychoeducation, behaviour activation, problem-solving strategies and group support to participants. In the control arm, women received usual care consisting of routine online educational pregnancy classes aided by the antenatal nurses. The women were assessed for depressive symptoms with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at baseline and 4-6 weeks post-intervention and also evaluated for anxiety, perceived social support, partner relationship, level of disability and sleep quality. In-depth interviews were conducted with women and other key stakeholders.

resultsOf the 99 consecutive women referred to the pregnancy schools, 91 (91.9%) were eligible and 88 (88.8%) consented to participate in the study and were randomized. Eighty-two (83%) completed the final assessments. Our main findings were that this preventive group intervention was feasible to be integrated into routine antenatal educational classes and it was valued by the women and delivery-agents. While the study was not powered to detect differences between intervention and control conditions, we found small trends towards reduction in anxiety and depressive symptoms favoring the intervention arm. No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsGiven the paucity of preventive interventions for perinatal depression in low and middle-income countries, a fully powered definitive randomized controlled trial of this feasible and acceptable intervention should be conducted.

trial registrationThe study was registered at Clinical Trails.gov ( NCT04819711 ) (Registration Date: 29/03/2021).

Indexed as

Depressive DisorderPrenatal CareChildDepressionFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPerinatal depressionPsychological interventionsThinking healthy program

Identifiers

PMID36604685
PMCPMC9816542
OpenAlexW4313647807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.