Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604522›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2023

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in children and adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 infection during Omicron BA.2 wave in Hong Kong.

Daniel Leung, Jaime S Rosa Duque, Ka Man Yip, Hung Kwan So, Wilfred H S Wong, Yu Lung Lau

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tracking the COVID-19 vaccines: The global landscape.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Leung *Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9360-6233
Jaime S Rosa Duque *Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5292-5510
Ka Man YipDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-3431
Hung Kwan SoDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6188-7587
Wilfred H S WongDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. whswong@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8396-2368
Yu Lung LauDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. lauylung@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-0289
University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 subvariant replaced BA.1 globally in early 2022, and caused an unprecedented tsunami of cases in Hong Kong, resulting in the collapse of elimination strategy. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac against BA.2 is unclear.

methodsWe utilize an ecological design incorporating population-level vaccine coverage statistics and territory-wide case-level SARS-CoV-2 infection surveillance data, and investigate the VE against infection during the Omicron BA.2 wave between January 1 to April 19, 2022, in Hong Kong for children and adolescents.

resultsWe estimate VE to be 33.0% for 1 dose of BNT162b2 in children aged 5-11 and 40.8% for 2 doses of CoronaVac in children aged 3-11. We also estimate 54.9% VE for 2 doses of BNT162b2, and 55.0% VE for 2 doses of CoronaVac in adolescents aged 12-18.

conclusionsOur findings support partly preserved VE against infection by variants of concerns for children and adolescents in settings with extremely low levels of prior SARS-CoV-2 circulation.

Identifiers

PMID36604522
OpenAlexW4313574536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.