Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604495›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Reproducibility of the computational fluid dynamic analysis of a cerebral aneurysm monitored over a decade.

Phani Kumari Paritala, Haveena Anbananthan, Jacob Hautaniemi, Macauley Smith, Antony George, Mark Allenby, Jessica Benitez Mendieta, Jiaqiu Wang, Liam Maclachlan, EeShern Liang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Phani Kumari ParitalaSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia.
Haveena AnbananthanSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia.
Jacob HautaniemiSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Macauley SmithSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia.
Antony GeorgeSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia.
Mark AllenbySchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia.
Jessica Benitez MendietaSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia.
Jiaqiu WangSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia.
Liam MaclachlanThe Kenneth G Jamieson Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
EeShern LiangThe Kenneth G Jamieson Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Marita PriorDepartment of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Prasad K D V YarlagaddaSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia.
Craig WinterThe Kenneth G Jamieson Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Zhiyong LiSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia. zylicam@gmail.com.
Queensland University of Technology · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUNingbo University · CNUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are increasingly utilised to evaluate intracranial aneurysm (IA) haemodynamics to aid in the prediction of morphological changes and rupture risk. However, these models vary and differences in published results warrant the investigation of IA-CFD reproducibility. This study aims to explore sources of intra-team variability and determine its impact on the aneurysm morphology and CFD parameters. A team of four operators were given six sets of magnetic resonance angiography data spanning a decade from one patient with a middle cerebral aneurysm. All operators were given the same protocol and software for model reconstruction and numerical analysis. The morphology and haemodynamics of the operator models were then compared. The segmentation, smoothing factor, inlet and outflow branch lengths were found to cause intra-team variability. There was 80% reproducibility in the time-averaged wall shear stress distribution among operators with the major difference attributed to the level of smoothing. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the clinical applicability of CFD simulations may be feasible if a standardised segmentation protocol is developed. Moreover, when analysing the aneurysm shape change over a decade, it was noted that the co-existence of positive and negative values of the wall shear stress divergence (WSSD) contributed to the growth of a daughter sac.

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmHemodynamicsHumansHydrodynamicsMagnetic Resonance AngiographyReproducibility of ResultsStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID36604495
PMCPMC9816094
OpenAlexW4313564070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.