ArticleScientific reports2023
External validation of binary machine learning models for pain intensity perception classification from EEG in healthy individuals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Electroencephalogram for the Diagnosis of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.Brain topography · 2026Pooled it
- Individual differences in the empathic experience of pain: An EEG and machine learning approach.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- [Application of support vector machine in identifying neuromodulation states in patients with zoster-associated pain].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- Personalized adaptive virtual reality experience driven by electroencephalography-based pain recognition.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine learning classification of active viewing of pain and non-pain images using EEG does not exceed chance in external validation samples.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoding of pain during heel lancing in human neonates with EEG signal and machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain.BMC neuroscience · 2023Article
- Enhancing clinical decision-making: An externally validated machine learning model for predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in gliomas using radiomics from presurgical magnetic resonance imaging.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discrimination of pain intensity using machine learning (ML) and electroencephalography (EEG) has significant potential for clinical applications, especially in scenarios where self-report is unsuitable. However, existing research is limited due to a lack of external validation (assessing performance using novel data). We aimed for the first external validation study for pain intensity classification with EEG. Pneumatic pressure stimuli were delivered to the fingernail bed at high and low pain intensities during two independent EEG experiments with healthy participants. Study one (n = 25) was utilised for training and cross-validation. Study two (n = 15) was used for external validation one (identical stimulation parameters to study one) and external validation two (new stimulation parameters). Time-frequency features of peri-stimulus EEG were computed on a single-trial basis for all electrodes. ML training and analysis were performed on a subset of features, identified through feature selection, which were distributed across scalp electrodes and included frontal, central, and parietal regions. Results demonstrated that ML models outperformed chance. The Random Forest (RF) achieved the greatest accuracies of 73.18, 68.32 and 60.42% for cross-validation, external validation one and two, respectively. Importantly, this research is the first to externally validate ML and EEG for the classification of intensity during experimental pain, demonstrating promising performance which generalises to novel samples and paradigms. These findings offer the most rigorous estimates of ML's clinical potential for pain classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.