Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Dialects in leaf-clipping and other leaf-modifying gestures between neighbouring communities of East African chimpanzees.

Gal Badihi, Kirsty E Graham, Brittany Fallon, Alexandra Safryghin, Adrian Soldati, Klaus Zuberbühler, Catherine Hobaiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Utterance evolution: the road to generative, combinatorial communicators.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brokering peace in the ape (culture) wars.Evolutionary human sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Concerted conservation actions to support chimpanzee cultures.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Overcoming bias in the comparison of human language and animal communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gal BadihiSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. gb64@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5025-906X
Kirsty E GrahamSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7422-7676
Brittany FallonSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Alexandra SafryghinSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8019-5455
Adrian SoldatiSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3618-5022
Klaus ZuberbühlerSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8378-088X
Catherine HobaiterSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3893-0524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dialects are a cultural property of animal communication previously described in the signals of several animal species. While dialects have predominantly been described in vocal signals, chimpanzee leaf-clipping and other 'leaf-modifying' gestures, used across chimpanzee and bonobo communities, have been suggested as a candidate for cultural variation in gestural communication. Here we combine direct observation with archaeological techniques to compare the form and use of leaf-modifying gestures in two neighbouring communities of East African chimpanzees. We found that while both communities used multiple forms, primarily within sexual solicitation, they showed a strong preference for a single, different gesture form. The observed variation in form preference between these neighbouring communities within the same context suggests that these differences are, at least in part, socially derived. Our results highlight an unexplored source of variation and flexibility in gestural communication, opening the door for future research to explore socially derived dialects in non-vocal communication.

Indexed as

HominidaePan troglodytesAnimal CommunicationAnimalsGesturesHumansLanguagePan paniscus

Identifiers

PMID36604445
PMCPMC9814361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.