Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604393›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2023

Evaluation of the Community Health Worker Model for COVID-19 Response and Recovery.

Saira Nawaz, Kyle J Moon, Rosa Vazquez, Jasmin R Navarrete, Anne Trinh, Lizette Escobedo, Gloria Itzel Montiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of the COVID-19 Vaccination CampaignPublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saira NawazCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Evaluation Studies (HOPES), The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 381 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Nawaz.16@osu.edu.
Kyle J MoonCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Evaluation Studies (HOPES), The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 381 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Rosa VazquezAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, 90040, USA.
Jasmin R NavarreteAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, 90040, USA.
Anne TrinhCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Evaluation Studies (HOPES), The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 381 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Lizette EscobedoAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, 90040, USA.
Gloria Itzel MontielAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, 90040, USA.

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
HRSA HHS U3S42190NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs), or promotores de salud, have long played a role in health promotion, but the COVID-19 pandemic has brought renewed attention to the functions, sustainability, and financing of CHW models. ¡Andale! ¿Que Esperas? was a 12-month (June 2021-May 2022) campaign that expanded the CHW workforce to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates in structurally vulnerable, Latinx communities across California. This mixed-methods evaluation aims to elucidate (1) the role of CHWs in COVID-19 response, recovery, and rebuilding and (2) the importance, needs, and perils of CHW models in the COVID-19 era and beyond. CHWs facilitated 159,074 vaccinations and vaccine appointments by countering mis/disinformation, addressing mental health and social needs, building digital competencies, and meeting people where they are, all of which expanded access and instilled confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine. CHWs' success in engaging the community lies in their shared lived experience as well as their accessibility and recognition in the community, enabling their role in both immediate response and long-term recovery. Funding instability imperils the advances made by CHWs, and efforts are needed to institutionalize the CHW workforce with sustainable funding models. While Medicaid reimbursement models exist in some states, these models are often limited to healthcare services, overlooking a critical function of the CHW model: building community resilience and mobilizing the community for social change.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCommunity Health WorkersHealth PromotionHumansPandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinesCommunity health workerEvaluationHealth equityMixed-methodsPromotores de saludPublic health

Identifiers

PMID36604393
PMCPMC9816010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.