Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604360›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer in BRCA Gene Mutation Carriers: Outcomes at 70 Months Median Follow-Up.

Alexandra J Webster, Julia N Shanno, Heidi S Santa Cruz, Bridget N Kelly, Meghan Garstka, Anthony Henriquez, Michelle C Specht, Michele A Gadd, Francys C Verdial, Anvy Nguyen and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hot Topics in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Counselling Framework for GermlineCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra J WebsterBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Julia N ShannoBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Heidi S Santa CruzBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Bridget N KellyBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Meghan GarstkaBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Anthony HenriquezBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michelle C SpechtBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michele A GaddBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Francys C VerdialBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Anvy NguyenBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tawakalitu O OseniBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Suzanne B CoopeyBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Barbara L SmithBreast Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. blsmith1@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetention of the nipple-areola complex with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) techniques provides a more natural cosmetic result than procedures that sacrifice the nipple. While the oncologic safety of NSM is established by several studies, there is little long-term data on outcomes in BRCA mutation carriers with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsBRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent NSM and immediate reconstruction from 2008 to 2019 were reviewed and patients with breast cancer on biopsy or final pathology were included. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics, as well as treatment, recurrence, and survival data were collected.

resultsA total of 114 therapeutic NSM were performed in 105 BRCA mutation carriers (56 BRCA1, 47 BRCA2, and two women with both mutations). Median age was 45 years. Cancers were 18% stage 0, 52% stage I, 27% stage II, and 3% stage III. Mean invasive tumor size was 1.6 cm and 33 (35%) invasive tumors were triple negative. There were five (4.4%) positive nipple margins on final pathology; all underwent nipple excision. Most patients (80, 76%) received systemic therapy: 65 (62%) received chemotherapy and 48 (46%) received endocrine therapy. At 70 months median follow-up (range 15-150 months), no patient had developed a recurrence in the retained nipple-areola complex or at the site of a nipple excised for a positive margin. The rate of locoregional recurrence outside the nipple was 2.6%, and the rate of distant recurrence was 3.8%. Overall survival was 96%.

conclusionsNSM is a safe option for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who undergo mastectomy for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNipplesRetrospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID36604360
OpenAlexW4313555874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.