ArticleBMJ open2023
Telehealth use in Australian primary healthcare during COVID-19: a cross-sectional descriptive survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychological Factors That Contribute to the Use of Video Consultations in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- A qualitative study on blood and marrow transplant recipients' perceptions of health professional roles following BMT and preferences for ongoing care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Trade-offs between Accessibility and Practicality in Global Telemedicine: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Factors that influence the uptake of virtual care solutions in Australian primary care practice: a systematic scoping review.JBI evidence implementation · 2025Article
- Telehealth Initiative to Enhance Primary Care Access in Brazil (UBS+Digital Project): Multicenter Prospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Healthcare practitioners' acceptance of using telehealth in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the delivery of the family nurse partnership programme in Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2025Article
- Improving telehealth for persons with multiple sclerosis - a cross-sectional study from the Australian MS longitudinal study.Disability and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Tailoring communication practices to support effective delivery of telehealth in general practice.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Access, Readiness and Willingness to Engage in Allied Health Telerehabilitation Services for Adults: Does Cultural and Linguistic Diversity Make a Difference?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Predictors of Long COVID in Patients Accessing a National Digital Mental Health Service.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Telehealth's future in Australian primary health care: a qualitative study exploring lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic.BJGP open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate Australian primary healthcare professionals' experiences of the rapid upscaling of telehealth during COVID-19.
designA cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS AND
settingTwo hundred and seventeen general practitioners, nurses and allied health professionals employed in primary healthcare settings across Australia were recruited via social media and professional organisations.
methodsAn online survey was disseminated between December 2020 and March 2021. The survey comprised items about individual demographics, experiences of delivering telehealth consultations, perceived quality of telehealth consultations and future perceptions of telehealth.
resultsTelephone was the most widely used method of providing telehealth, with less than 50% of participants using a combination of telephone and video. Key barriers to telehealth use related to the inability to undertake physical examination or physical intervention. Telehealth was perceived to improve access to healthcare for some vulnerable groups and those living in rural settings, but reduced access for people from non-English-speaking backgrounds. Quality of telehealth care was considered mostly or somewhat the same as care provided face-to-face, with actual or perceived negative outcomes related to missed or delayed diagnosis. Overwhelmingly, participants wanted telehealth to continue with guaranteed ongoing funding. Some 43.7% of participants identified the need to further improve telehealth models of care.
conclusionThe rapid shift to telehealth has facilitated ongoing care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, further work is required to better understand how telehealth can be best harnessed to add value to service delivery in usual care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.