Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36604132›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Validation of a paediatric sepsis screening tool to identify children with sepsis in the emergency department: a statewide prospective cohort study in Queensland, Australia.

Patricia Gilholm, Kristen Gibbons, Paula Lister, Amanda Harley, Adam Irwin, Sainath Raman, Michael Rice, Luregn J Schlapbach, Queensland Statewide Sepsis Collaborative

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia GilholmChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kristen GibbonsChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Paula ListerChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Amanda HarleyChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Adam IrwinQueensland Paediatric Sepsis Program, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sainath RamanChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Michael RiceClinical Excellence Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Luregn J SchlapbachChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia l.schlapbach@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2281-2598
Queensland Statewide Sepsis Collaborative
Queensland Health · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend the implementation of systematic screening for sepsis. We aimed to validate a paediatric sepsis screening tool and derive a simplified screening tool.

designProspective multicentre study conducted between August 2018 and December 2019. We assessed the performance of the paediatric sepsis screening tool using stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses with 10-fold cross-validation and evaluated the final model at defined risk thresholds.

settingTwelve emergency departments (EDs) in Queensland, Australia.

participants3473 children screened for sepsis, of which 523 (15.1%) were diagnosed with sepsis.

interventionsA 32-item paediatric sepsis screening tool including rapidly available information from triage, risk factors and targeted physical examination. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Senior medical officer-diagnosed sepsis combined with the administration of intravenous antibiotics in the ED.

resultsThe 32-item paediatric sepsis screening tool had good predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.80, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.82). A simplified tool containing 16 of 32 criteria had comparable performance and retained an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.82). To reach a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 87% to 92%), the final model achieved a specificity of 51% (95% CI 49% to 53%). Sensitivity analyses using the outcomes of sepsis-associated organ dysfunction (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.87) and septic shock (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.88) confirmed the main results.

conclusionsA simplified paediatric sepsis screening tool performed well to identify children with sepsis in the ED. Implementation of sepsis screening tools may improve the timely recognition and treatment of sepsis.

Indexed as

SepsisAustraliaChildEmergency Service, HospitalHumansProspective StudiesQueenslandRetrospective StudiesINFECTIOUS DISEASESPAEDIATRICSQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36604132
PMCPMC9827183
OpenAlexW4313560808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.